Natural language processing in the intensive care unit: A scoping review
- PMID: 39355491
- PMCID: PMC11440058
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.06.008
Natural language processing in the intensive care unit: A scoping review
Abstract
Objectives: Natural language processing (NLP) is a branch of artificial intelligence focused on enabling computers to interpret and analyse text-based data. The intensive care specialty is known to generate large volumes of data, including free-text, however, NLP applications are not commonly used either in critical care clinical research or quality improvement projects. This review aims to provide an overview of how NLP has been used in the intensive care specialty and promote an understanding of NLP's potential future clinical applications.
Design: Scoping review.
Data sources: A systematic search was developed with an information specialist and deployed on the PubMed electronic journal database. Results were restricted to the last 10 years to ensure currency.
Review methods: Screening and data extraction were undertaken by two independent reviewers, with any disagreements resolved by a third. Given the heterogeneity of the eligible articles, a narrative synthesis was conducted.
Results: Eighty-seven eligible articles were included in the review. The most common type (n = 24) were studies that used NLP-derived features to predict clinical outcomes, most commonly mortality (n = 16). Next were articles that used NLP to identify a specific concept (n = 23), including sepsis, family visitation and mental health disorders. Most studies only described the development and internal validation of their algorithm (n = 79), and only one reported the implementation of an algorithm in a clinical setting.
Conclusions: Natural language processing has been used for a variety of purposes in the ICU context. Increasing awareness of these techniques amongst clinicians may lead to more clinically relevant algorithms being developed and implemented.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Intensive care medicine; Natural language processing; Scoping review.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Natural Language Processing for Work-Related Stress Detection Among Health Professionals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 15;13:e56267. doi: 10.2196/56267. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38749026 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Applications of natural language processing at emergency department triage: A narrative review.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0279953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279953. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38096321 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Natural language processing algorithms for mapping clinical text fragments onto ontology concepts: a systematic review and recommendations for future studies.J Biomed Semantics. 2020 Nov 16;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13326-020-00231-z. J Biomed Semantics. 2020. PMID: 33198814 Free PMC article.
-
The Growing Impact of Natural Language Processing in Healthcare and Public Health.Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241290095. doi: 10.1177/00469580241290095. Inquiry. 2024. PMID: 39396164 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Natural language processing in critical care: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Intensive Care Med. 2025 Mar;51(3):585-589. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07776-y. Epub 2025 Jan 20. Intensive Care Med. 2025. PMID: 39831996 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources