Personalized messaging enhances hospital debt collection while prosocial appeals fail: Evidence from a field experiment
- PMID: 39355661
- PMCID: PMC11443582
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076241277035
Personalized messaging enhances hospital debt collection while prosocial appeals fail: Evidence from a field experiment
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to understand how different communication strategies influence patients' behaviour in paying unpaid hospital bills. The research focused on a healthcare system where patients have to pay a significant portion of their medical costs out-of-pocket.
Methods: The research was conducted in collaboration with a debt collection agency in Latvia. The field experiment involved 9196 individuals with unpaid hospital bills. These individuals received randomly assigned reminders through mobile text messages and e-mails. The study compared the effectiveness of personalized messages, which included the recipient's name, with generic reminders and messages that appealed to social norms or public good contributions.
Results: The findings revealed that personalized messages, specifically those that included the recipient's name, significantly improved payment rates compared with generic reminders. Conversely, messages that used social norms or public good appeals did not have a significant impact on payment rates.
Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of personalized communication strategies in improving hospital debt collection. Even simple, cost-effective modifications in communication, like adding the recipient's name, can significantly enhance payment compliance. This approach not only keep the financial books of healthcare providers balanced but also suggests that personalized strategies can be extended to other areas of healthcare management. However, while these findings are promising, they indicate that more personalized and nuanced communication strategies are needed to address the broader issue of unpaid hospital bills effectively.
Keywords: Trials; behaviour change; digital; health communications; patient credit and collection; tailoring.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Pavlova M, Tambor M, Stepurko T, et al. Assessment of patient payment policy in CEE countries: from a conceptual framework to policy indicators. Soc Econ 2012; 34: 193–220.
-
- Danyliv A, Groot W, Gryga Iet al. et al. Willingness and ability to pay for physician services in six Central and Eastern European countries. Health Policy 2014; 117: 72–82. - PubMed
-
- Purcel AA, Dragos CM, Mare Cet al. et al. Voluntary health insurance and out-of-pocket payments in European OECD countries. Econ Model 2023; 120: 106190.
-
- Grigorakis N, Floros C, Tsangari Het al. et al. Macroeconomic and financing determinants of out of pocket payments in health care: evidence from selected OECD countries. J Policy Model 2018; 40: 1290–1312.
-
- Karanikolos M, Mladovsky P, Cylus J, et al. Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet 2013; 381: 1323–1331. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
