Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 17:11:1458829.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1458829. eCollection 2024.

Refractive errors in Tianjin youth aged 6-18 years: exploring urban-rural variations and contributing factors

Affiliations

Refractive errors in Tianjin youth aged 6-18 years: exploring urban-rural variations and contributing factors

Xin-He Fang et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Purpose: Refractive errors, particularly myopia, constitute a significant global public health concern, contributing to morbidity and disability. A more comprehensive understanding of the determinants of refractive errors and the differences between urban and rural areas is essential to develop effective preventive measures for youth. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and risk factors of refractive errors among youth in urban and rural Tianjin, China.

Methods: This school-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022. Elementary, middle, and high school students aged 6-18 years from both urban and rural areas of Tianjin were included. All participants underwent visual acuity testing and refractive measurement and completed comprehensive questionnaires.

Results: A total of 346,146 participants (176,628 boys) were included in this investigation (50.36% for urban and 49.64% for rural, respectively). Myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia were present in 56.8, 9.7, 56.64, and 21.3% of urban students, respectively. Similarly, rural students had a prevalence of 57.6, 11.5, 56.48, and 22.0% for the respective conditions. Compared to rural students, after adjusting for age, sex, and other significant variables, urban students were 1.05 times more likely to have myopia (95% CI: 1.03-1.07, p < 0.0001), 0.71 times less likely to have hyperopia (95% CI: 0.69-0.73, p < 0.0001), and 1.02 times more likely to have astigmatism (95% CI: 0.69-0.73, p < 0.0001). There was no significant association between anisometropia and residence (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98-1.02, p = 0.9850). Sociodemographic and physiological factors contribute to the disparities in the prevalence of refractive errors between urban and rural areas. Age, increased near-work activities, and Decreased outdoor time were identified as risk factors for myopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia. Conversely, the absence of a parental history of refractive errors emerged as a protective factor for myopia and astigmatism among students. Lower parental education levels were negatively correlated with the risk of myopia and anisometropia in their children. Specifically, the lower the parental education, the greater the risk of myopia in their offspring. For urban students only, lower parental education was associated with an increased risk of astigmatism.

Conclusion: Crude prevalence estimates May not accurately reflect the true burden of refractive error due to confounding factors such as age and sex. Accounting for these factors revealed that urban students were more likely to have myopia and astigmatism but less likely to have hyperopia compared to their rural counterparts. These disparities highlight the importance of considering geographical variations when implementing strategies for myopia control and prevention.

Keywords: China; Tianjin; prevalence; refractive errors; risk factors; urban–rural differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of myopia trends with grade level in Tianjin, China.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution characteristics of myopia in urban and rural areas of Tianjin, China.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Ratio of male-to-female student composition in urban and rural areas of Tianjin, China.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Flitcroft DI. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2012) 31:622–60. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.06.004, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marcus MW, de Vries MM, Junoy Montolio FG, Jansonius NM. Myopia as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. (2011) 118:1989–1994.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.012, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan IG, He M, Rose KA. Epidemic of pathologic myopia: what can laboratory studies and epidemiology tell us? Retina. (2017) 37:989–97. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001272 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang YH, Huang C, Tseng YL, Zhong J, Li XM. Refractive error and eye health: an umbrella review of Meta-analyses. Front Med (Lausanne). (2021) 8:759767. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.759767, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang X, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Cotter SA, Matsumura S, Mitchell P, Rose KA, et al. . Association of parental myopia with higher risk of myopia among multiethnic children before school age. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2020) 138:501–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0412, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources