Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;31(1):131-146.
doi: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0451. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

Optimal tacrolimus levels for reducing CKD risk and the impact of intrapatient variability on CKD and ESRD development following liver transplantation

Affiliations

Optimal tacrolimus levels for reducing CKD risk and the impact of intrapatient variability on CKD and ESRD development following liver transplantation

Soon Kyu Lee et al. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aims: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) following liver transplantation (LT), with a specific focus on tacrolimus levels and intrapatient variability (IPV).

Methods: Among the 1,076 patients who underwent LT between 2000 and 2018, 952 were included in the analysis. The tacrolimus doses and levels were recorded every 3 months, and the IPV was calculated using the coefficient of variability. The cumulative incidence rates of CKD and ESRD were calculated based on baseline kidney function at the time of LT. The impact of tacrolimus levels and their IPV on the development of CKD and ESRD was evaluated, and the significant risk factors were identified.

Results: Within a median follow-up of 97.3 months, the 5-year cumulative incidence rates of CKD (0.58 vs. 0.24) and ESRD (0.07 vs. 0.01) were significantly higher in the acute kidney injury group than in the normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) group. In the normal GFR group, the tacrolimus levels were identified as a risk factor for CKD, with a level of ≤4.5 ng/mL suggested as optimal for minimizing the risk of CKD. Furthermore, the IPV of tacrolimus levels and doses emerged as a significant risk factor for CKD development in both groups (p<0.05), with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate also being a risk factor in HBV-infected patients. The IPV of tacrolimus levels was also a significant factor in ESRD development (p<0.05).

Conclusion: This study elucidated the optimal tacrolimus trough level and highlighted the impact of IPV on the CKD and ESRD development post-LT.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Diabetes mellitus; Liver transplantation; Tacrolimus; Tenofovir.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A, B) Cumulative incidence of CKD based on the baseline GFR at the time of LT. (C) Changes in the kidney function in CKD patients from the normal GFR group. (D, E) Changes in the distribution of kidney function according to the baseline GFR at LT time. CKD, chronic kidney disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; LT, liver transplantation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A, B) Changes in the eGFR in ESRD patients and (C) cumulative incidence of ESRD according to the baseline GFR at the time of LT. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LT, liver transplantation; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Changes in the risk of CKD development according to the tacrolimus level among patients with normal GFR at (A) the time of LT and (B) 1-year post-LT time. GFR, glomerular filtration rate; LT, liver transplantation; CKD, chronic kidney disease.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison in the serial changes of the tacrolimus level according to the development of (A, B) CKD and (C, D) ESRD. CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Comparison of (A, B) total and (C, D) 3-year intrapatient variability between patients with and without CKD development during follow-up. (E, F) Comparison of total intrapatient variability between patients with ESRD, CKD without ESRD, and without CKD development during follow-up. CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; CV, coefficient of variants.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hill AL, Khan M, Kiani AZ, Lindemann JD, Vachharajani N, Doyle MB, et al. Global liver transplantation: emerging trends and ethical challenges. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408:418. - PubMed
    1. Jain A, Reyes J, Kashyap R, Dodson SF, Demetris AJ, Ruppert K, et al. Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4,000 consecutive patients at a single center. Ann Surg. 2000;232:490–500. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlton M, Levitsky J, Aqel B, OʼGrady J, Hemibach J, Rinella M, et al. International Liver Transplantation Society consensus statement on immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2018;102:727–743. - PubMed
    1. Lee SK, Jhun J, Lee SY, Choi S, Choi SS, Park MS, et al. A decrease in functional microbiomes represented as Faecalibacterium affects immune homeostasis in long-term stable liver transplant patients. Gut Microbes. 2022;14:2102885. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Leichtman AB, Young EW, et al. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:931–940. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources