Optimal tacrolimus levels for reducing CKD risk and the impact of intrapatient variability on CKD and ESRD development following liver transplantation
- PMID: 39355872
- PMCID: PMC11791583
- DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0451
Optimal tacrolimus levels for reducing CKD risk and the impact of intrapatient variability on CKD and ESRD development following liver transplantation
Abstract
Background/aims: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) following liver transplantation (LT), with a specific focus on tacrolimus levels and intrapatient variability (IPV).
Methods: Among the 1,076 patients who underwent LT between 2000 and 2018, 952 were included in the analysis. The tacrolimus doses and levels were recorded every 3 months, and the IPV was calculated using the coefficient of variability. The cumulative incidence rates of CKD and ESRD were calculated based on baseline kidney function at the time of LT. The impact of tacrolimus levels and their IPV on the development of CKD and ESRD was evaluated, and the significant risk factors were identified.
Results: Within a median follow-up of 97.3 months, the 5-year cumulative incidence rates of CKD (0.58 vs. 0.24) and ESRD (0.07 vs. 0.01) were significantly higher in the acute kidney injury group than in the normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) group. In the normal GFR group, the tacrolimus levels were identified as a risk factor for CKD, with a level of ≤4.5 ng/mL suggested as optimal for minimizing the risk of CKD. Furthermore, the IPV of tacrolimus levels and doses emerged as a significant risk factor for CKD development in both groups (p<0.05), with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate also being a risk factor in HBV-infected patients. The IPV of tacrolimus levels was also a significant factor in ESRD development (p<0.05).
Conclusion: This study elucidated the optimal tacrolimus trough level and highlighted the impact of IPV on the CKD and ESRD development post-LT.
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Diabetes mellitus; Liver transplantation; Tacrolimus; Tenofovir.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Hill AL, Khan M, Kiani AZ, Lindemann JD, Vachharajani N, Doyle MB, et al. Global liver transplantation: emerging trends and ethical challenges. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408:418. - PubMed
-
- Charlton M, Levitsky J, Aqel B, OʼGrady J, Hemibach J, Rinella M, et al. International Liver Transplantation Society consensus statement on immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2018;102:727–743. - PubMed
-
- Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Leichtman AB, Young EW, et al. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:931–940. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
