Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;117(1):240-249.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.3450. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Saroglitazar Magnesium in Cholestatic Cirrhosis With Hepatic Impairment and Participants With Renal Impairment

Affiliations

Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Saroglitazar Magnesium in Cholestatic Cirrhosis With Hepatic Impairment and Participants With Renal Impairment

Raj Vuppalanchi et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Saroglitazar magnesium, a dual PPAR α/γ agonist, currently in Phase III for treating primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), was evaluated for its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, safety, and pharmacodynamics in participants with cholestatic liver disease (CLD) across different levels of hepatic impairment (HI) and participants with severe renal impairment (RI). Three PK studies comparing saroglitazar with healthy controls were conducted: Study 1 involved daily oral doses of 1 or 2 mg for 4 weeks in 12 PBC cirrhosis participants with mild or moderate HI; Study 2 assessed single-dose PK (2 or 4 mg) in eight non-cirrhotic CLD participants; Study 3 evaluated single-dose PK (2 mg) in eight participants with severe RI. On day 1, saroglitazar exposure increased by 14.6-42% in mild HI vs. normal, but by day 28, levels were similar, indicating no accumulation. In moderate HI, exposure was significantly increased by 50.4-85% on days 1 and 28, with 34-46% lower clearance despite a similar half-life. The moderate HI group had a 59% higher exposure than the non-cirrhotic group. Saroglitazar (1 and 2 mg) reduced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels by 17-40% after 4 weeks in participants with abnormal baseline ALP. Single-dose PK in non-cirrhotic CLD (2 and 4 mg) and severe RI (2 mg) was comparable to matched controls without significant safety issues. Overall, saroglitazar (1 and 2 mg) was safe and well-tolerated in cholestatic cirrhosis with mild HI and participants with severe RI without major PK changes. Moderate HI increased exposure and decreased clearance without any safety concerns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Raj Vuppalanchi receives institutional funding from Zydus Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Terns, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, and Galectin Therapeutics. Additionally, he provides consultation services to Fortrea, Medpace, Cour Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Avante Sante, and GSK, where he serves as a member of hepatic adjudication and data safety monitoring committees. Mary M. Cruz has no conflict of interest. Taufik Momin and Harilal Patel are employees of Zydus Lifesciences Ltd., whereas Farheen Shaikh, Kimberly Swint, and Deven Parmar are employees of Zydus Therapeutics Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of C max (ng/mL) and AUC (ng/mL hour) of saroglitazar in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment with participants with normal hepatic function at day 1 and day 28. Days 1 and 28 AUCs represent AUC0–∞ and AUCτ, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of MELD‐NA scores with C max (a) and AUCtau (b) of patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment and participants with normal hepatic function after normalizing 1 and 2 mg doses at day 28.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in mean ALP levels after 1 mg (N = 4) or 2 mg (N = 3) saroglitazar magnesium treatment for 2 or 4 weeks in participants with baseline ALP at > ULN. Error bars represent observed standard deviations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Mean plasma concentration (ng/mL) vs. time (hour) plots after single saroglitazar magnesium dose of 1, 2, and 4 mg in patients recruited in two different parts (Part A and Part B) of SARO.19.003 study. (b) Semi‐log representation. Analyte: Saroglitazar Parent Drug.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lindor, K.D. , Bowlus, C.L. , Boyer, J. , Levy, C. & Mayo, M. Primary biliary cholangitis: 2021 practice guidance update from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 75, 1012–1013 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Alvaro, D. , Carpino, G. , Craxi, A. , Floreani, A. , Moschetta, A. & Invernizzi, P. Primary biliary cholangitis management: controversies, perspectives, and daily practice implications from an expert panel. Liver Int. 40, 2590–2601 (2020). - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver . EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: the diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. J. Hepatol. 67, 145–172 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Lu, M. et al. Increasing prevalence of primary biliary cholangitis and reduced mortality with treatment. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 1342–1350.e1 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Chen, R. , Tang, R. , Ma, X. & Gershwin, M.E. Immunologic responses and the pathophysiology of primary biliary cholangitis. Clin. Liver Dis. 26, 583–611 (2022). - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources