Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec;103(12):2475-2484.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14975. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

Routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 h after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas: A randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 h after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas: A randomized trial

C M Nashreen et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Our objective was to compare the performance of the first vaginal examination at 8 vs 4 h after amniotomy following Foley ripening in nulliparous labor induction.

Material and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2021 to January 2022. 210 nulliparas at term for labor induction were randomized: 105 each to first vaginal examination at 8 or 4 h after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to expedite labor. Primary outcomes were the amniotomy-to-delivery interval (non-inferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction with their allocated labor care (superiority hypothesis) within 24 h after delivery. Analyses performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-squared test as appropriate.

Results: The amniotomy-to-delivery interval was mean ± standard deviation 8.7 ± 3.4 vs 8.4 ± 3.7, mean difference 0.4 (97.5% CI: -0.7 to 1.5) hours, p = 0.442 within the pre-specified 2-hour non-inferiority margin, and maternal satisfaction score with allocated labor care was median [interquartile range] 8[7.5-10] vs 8[7.0-10], p = 0.248 for 8 vs 4 h arms, respectively. The amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals was 5.9 ± 2.3 vs 3.6 ± 1.0 h, p < 0.001, and the number of vaginal examinations was 2[1-2.5] vs 3 [2, 3], p < 0.001 for 8 vs 4 h, respectively. The first vaginal examination was less likely to have been performed as scheduled, more likely to be indicated by the urge to bear down, and non-reassuring cardiotocography for the 8 h arm (p < 0.001). Spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly more likely and instrumental vaginal delivery less likely, but cesarean rate was not significantly different for the 8 h arm (p = 0.017).

Conclusions: A routine first vaginal examination at 8 h compared to 4 h is non-inferior for the time to birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction although the number of vaginal examinations is fewer. The increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery and reduction in instrumental vaginal delivery rates warrant further powered primary evaluation.

Keywords: Foley; amniotomy; cervical ripening; cesarean; interval to delivery; labor induction; labor progress; maternal satisfaction; oxytocin; vaginal delivery; vaginal examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Recruitment flow chart into a randomized controlled trial of routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 h after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis on probability of spontaneous vaginal delivery stratified by routine vaginal examination at 8 vs 4 h after early amniotomy. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis on probability of all vaginal delivery stratified by routine vaginal examination at 8 vs 4 h after early amniotomy.

Similar articles

References

    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68(13):1‐47. - PubMed
    1. Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):35‐42. - PubMed
    1. Bleicher I, Dikopoltsev E, Kadour‐Ferro E, et al. Double‐balloon device for 6 compared with 12 hours for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:1‐1160. - PubMed
    1. Jones MN, Palmer KR, Pathirana MM, et al. Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI collaborative): an individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2022;400(10364):1681‐1692. - PubMed
    1. Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(9):1086‐1095. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources