The Financial Impact of a Cosurgeon in Breast Microsurgery
- PMID: 39356712
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011791
The Financial Impact of a Cosurgeon in Breast Microsurgery
Abstract
Background: Cosurgeon approaches for autologous breast reconstruction have demonstrated improvements in operative efficiency. The health system financial impact, however, warrants further investigation.
Methods: Retrospective review of consecutive autologous reconstructions was performed between 2017 and 2022. Primary outcome measures consisted of length of stay, operative time, and financial metrics. Cases were stratified by cosurgeon presence, timing, and laterality.
Results: A total of 264 cases met inclusion criteria; these consisted of 117 cosurgeon and 147 single-surgeon cases. Cosurgeon cases demonstrated decreased length of stay (2.4 days versus 3.1 days; P < 0.01) and decreased operative time in unilateral (269 minutes versus 370 minutes; P < 0.01) and bilateral (399 minutes versus 582 minutes; P < 0.01) cases. Cosurgeon cases were also associated with decreased total cost ($25,160 versus $31,758; P < 0.01), direct cost ($15,558 versus $19,283; P < 0.01), and indirect cost ($9602 versus $12,475; P < 0.01); decreased total charges ($98,728 versus $120,981; P < 0.01); and increased margin ($1099 versus -$6255; P < 0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences, albeit at varying magnitudes, in these particular metrics across all levels of reconstruction timing with the inclusion of a cosurgeon.
Conclusions: Cosurgeon breast microsurgery not only improves operative efficiency, but also translates to improved financial metrics. As the transition is made to value-based care models, this is particularly relevant to health systems offering microsurgical breast reconstruction. Analyses of downstream benefits including optimized patient throughput and surgeon opportunity cost warrant investigation.
Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
References
-
- Fan KL, Song DH. Autologous vs prosthetic breast reconstruction: where do we stand? JAMA Surg. 2018;153:899–900.
-
- Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S–13S.
-
- Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:891–899.
-
- Mundy LR, Rosenberger LH, Rushing CN, et al. The evolution of breast satisfaction and well-being after breast cancer: a propensity-matched comparison to the norm. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:595–604.
-
- Ricci JA, Epstein S, Momoh AO, Lin SJ, Singhal D, Lee BT. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Surg Res. 2017;218:108–116.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials