Ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity predicts clinical response in acute myeloid leukemia in the prospective VenEx trial
- PMID: 39357056
- DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024968
Ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity predicts clinical response in acute myeloid leukemia in the prospective VenEx trial
Abstract
The B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax has shown promise for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying patients likely to respond remains a challenge, especially for those with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. We evaluated the utility of ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity testing to predict treatment responses to venetoclax-azacitidine in a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial. The trial recruited 104 participants with previously untreated (n = 48), R/R (n = 39), or previously treated secondary AML (sAML) (n = 17). The primary end point was complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) rate in ex vivo sensitive trial participants during the first 3 therapy cycles. The key secondary end points included the correlations between ex vivo drug sensitivity, responses, and survival. Venetoclax sensitivity was successfully assessed in 102 of 104 participants, with results available within a median of 3 days from sampling. In previously untreated AML, ex vivo sensitivity corresponded to an 85% (34/40) CR/CRi rate, with a median overall survival (OS) of 28.7 months, compared with 5.5 months for ex vivo resistant patients (P = .002). For R/R/sAML, ex vivo sensitivity resulted in a 62% CR/CRi rate (21/34) and median OS of 9.7 vs 3.3 months for ex vivo resistant patients (P < .001). In univariate and multivariate analysis, ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity was the strongest predictor for a favorable treatment response and survival. This trial demonstrates the feasibility of integrating ex vivo drug testing into clinical practice to identify patients with AML, particularly in the R/R setting, who benefit from venetoclax. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04267081.
© 2025 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A. Partanen reports personal fees from AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Behring, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda. M.E.L.K. reports personal fees from Johnson & Johnson and Amgen. K.P. reports research funding from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. C.A.H. reports research funding from Novartis, Orion Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Oncopeptides, and Kronos Bio Inc and personal fees from Oncopeptides. P.E. reports personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, and Sanofi. M.P. reports personal fees from Pfizer, Novartis, and AbbVie. J.R. reports personal fees from Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. T.S. reports personal fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, and Takeda. H.K. reports research funding from AbbVie (outside the submitted work) and personal fees from Faron. M.K. reports personal fees from Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Faron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Pfizer and research funding from AbbVie (outside the submitted work). The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.