Preserving Essential Skills: The Future of Vaginal Hysterectomy Training in Urogynaecology
- PMID: 39358908
- PMCID: PMC11625650
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17974
Preserving Essential Skills: The Future of Vaginal Hysterectomy Training in Urogynaecology
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the training and self-assessed proficiency of surgeons in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We focused on the factors that influence decision-making, the surgical techniques employed, the training received, and the management of complications.
Design: A cross-sectional survey.
Setting: An electronic questionnaire.
Population: European Urogynaecological Association (EUGA) and International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) members.
Methods: A total of 33 questions evaluating surgeon preference regarding vaginal surgeries.
Main outcome measures: Demographics, surgical selection, proficiency and technique, and training methods.
Results: There were 471 respondents, of which 273 (58%) dedicated more than 50% of their week to urogynaecology. 250 (53%) had completed a fellowship, with 215 (86%) of those fellowships being in urogynaecology and pelvic floor reconstruction. A preference for hysterectomy in cases of uterine descent was noted by 297 (63%) respondents, influenced mainly by patient preference, age, and prolapse anatomical score. A total of 443 (94%) were proficient in vaginal hysterectomy, with two-thirds performing 30 or fewer procedures annually; 212 (45%) reporting a decrease in the number of procedures over the last decade. Additionally, 373 (79%) respondents believed that 10-30 cases were needed to achieve and maintain proficiency.
Conclusion: Vaginal hysterectomy remains a key component in uterine prolapse repair. However, with the rise of uterine-sparing prolapse repairs, the decision-making process may be influenced by multiple factors, including surgical training. Emphasis should be placed on training and maintaining proficiency in both traditional and novel techniques.
Keywords: subspecialisation; surgical training; surgical volume; training requirements; vaginal hysterectomy.
© 2024 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Heft J. S. and Adam R. A., “Apical Prolapse: Is There a Best Approach?,” Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports 13, no. 3 (2018): 101–110, 10.1007/S11884-018-0469-0/METRICS. - DOI
-
- Azadi A., Marchand G., Masoud A. T., et al., “Complications and Objective Outcomes of Uterine Preserving Surgeries for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Versus Procedures Removing the Uterus, a Systematic Review,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 267 (2021): 90–98, 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2021.10.020. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
