Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 14;86(10):5938-5946.
doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002478. eCollection 2024 Oct.

CRISPR/Cas9 in the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD) and its comparison with traditional treatment approaches: a review

Affiliations
Review

CRISPR/Cas9 in the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD) and its comparison with traditional treatment approaches: a review

Hamza Tariq et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a common hereditary blood disorder that profoundly impacts individuals' health, causing chronic pain, anemia, organ damage, increased susceptibility to infections, and social and psychological effects. Over the years, advances in treatment have improved the long-term outcomes of SCD patients. However, problems such as limited access to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and potential complications associated with the available therapies underscore the importance of continued research and development. The recent FDA approval of Casgevy (Exagamglogene autotemcel), a genetic therapy based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology, demonstrates a comprehensive effort to address the complexity of SCD using new technologies. This review explores the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 for treating SCD and evaluates its efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes compared to traditional treatment approaches. Long-term research is needed to comprehensively assess the safety, effectiveness, and inclusion of CRISPR/Cas9, ensuring its overall efficacy.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; casgevy; gene editing; hematopoietic stem cell therapy; sickle cell disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Advantages and limitations of traditional treatment options and gene therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 for sickle cell disease. (Created with biorender.com).

References

    1. Sedrak A, Kondamudi NP. Sickle Cell Disease. StatPearls StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023. StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2023.
    1. Brousse V, Rees DC. Sickle cell disease: more than a century of progress. where do we stand now? Indian J Med Res 2021;154:4–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kavanagh PL, Fasipe TA, Wun T. Sickle cell disease: a review. JAMA 2022;328:57–68. - PubMed
    1. Prevention CDC. Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/sickle-cell/about/
    1. Mangla A, Ehsan M, Agarwal N, et al. . Sickle Cell Anemia. StatPearls StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023. StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2023.

LinkOut - more resources