Student Performance and Perceptions of Flipped Classrooms and Small Group Discussions as Teaching Tools in Practical Anatomy
- PMID: 39360057
- PMCID: PMC11446484
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68459
Student Performance and Perceptions of Flipped Classrooms and Small Group Discussions as Teaching Tools in Practical Anatomy
Abstract
Introduction A quasi-experimental study was conducted to assess students' attitudes toward the flipped practical classroom and evaluate its effectiveness in teaching practical anatomy. Methods Two survey questionnaires were developed: the first assessed students' attitudes toward flipped practical classrooms, while the second focused on the obstacles and difficulties students might encounter in this learning environment. Results We found that students rated flipped learning significantly higher compared to other teaching methods, particularly in terms of the quality of learning materials, enhancement of learning skills, engagement and understanding of anatomy topics, and problem-solving abilities. The highest mean examination grades were observed for the pretest flipped modality, followed by the pretest small group discussion (mean scores: 82.72 vs. 54.46, F = 43.2, P = 0.004). Conclusions Students hold positive attitudes toward flipped classrooms and small group discussions compared to traditional classes.
Keywords: applied anatomy teaching; flipped classroom; medical education; performance; students’ attitude.
Copyright © 2024, Jumaa et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Imam Mohammed bin Saud Islamic University issued approval 367/2022. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Neuroanatomy teaching in the flipped classroom: Attitudes and effect on medical students' performance.Clin Anat. 2025 Jan;38(1):105-112. doi: 10.1002/ca.24232. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Clin Anat. 2025. PMID: 39454107
-
Examining the effects of student-centered flipped classroom in physiology education.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04166-8. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37046277 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improvement in Student Performance and Perceptions through a Flipped Anatomy Classroom: Shifting from Passive Traditional to Active Blended Learning.Anat Sci Educ. 2021 Jul;14(4):482-490. doi: 10.1002/ase.2015. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Anat Sci Educ. 2021. PMID: 32881423
-
The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;19(3):e1339. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1339. eCollection 2023 Sep. Campbell Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37425620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis.BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 15;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29544495 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Why don't they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review. Bergman EM, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. Med Teach. 2011;33:403–409. - PubMed
-
- A survival strategy for anatomy. Fasel JH, Morel P, Gailloud P. Lancet. 2005;365:754. - PubMed
-
- Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: the importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy. Morton DA, Colbert-Getz JM. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:170–175. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources