Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 2;16(9):e68461.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.68461. eCollection 2024 Sep.

A Review of Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Watch-and-Wait Protocol in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

A Review of Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Watch-and-Wait Protocol in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Iulian M Slavu et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The treatment of rectal cancer underwent a significant change with the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME), which substantially improved recurrence rates. However, TME is associated with complications such as fecal incontinence and poor bladder control, especially in tumors located near the anal verge. The watch-and-wait (WW) protocol has emerged as an alternative for patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. This narrative review, developed according to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles guidelines, evaluates neoadjuvant treatments and the WW protocol for rectal cancer. Literature was sourced from the PubMed database using specific search terms related to neoadjuvant therapy and the WW protocol, resulting in 63 articles selected for discussion. Neoadjuvant treatment, including chemoradiation and short-course radiotherapy, is indicated for T3 and T4 rectal adenocarcinomas. Studies like the German Rectal Cancer Study Group and the PRODIGE 23 trial have shown the benefits of preoperative treatment, including improved disease-free survival and reduced local recurrence rates. However, challenges in adopting the WW protocol include the risk of local regrowth and distant metastasis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise in mismatch repair-deficient patients, yet the data are insufficient to fully endorse WW for these cases. The WW protocol is viable for selected rectal cancer patients, with ongoing debates regarding criteria for inclusion. Key challenges include accurately identifying cCR and managing patients with near-complete responses. MRI and endoscopic evaluation are crucial for assessing treatment response, although achieving a pathological complete response remains uncertain. The WW strategy offers a potential organ-preserving approach in rectal cancer management but requires careful patient selection and comprehensive risk-benefit discussions. Further research is needed to refine criteria for inclusion and optimize treatment protocols, enhancing outcomes while minimizing invasive interventions.

Keywords: distal rectal cancer; general surgery; neoadjuvant radiation therapy; radiotherapy (rt); watch and wait protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

References

    1. Total mesorectal excision - 40 years of standard of rectal cancer surgery. Votava J, Kachlik D, Hoch J. Acta Chir Belg. 2020;120:286–290. - PubMed
    1. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, et al. Ann Surg. 2004;240:711–717. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP, Proscurshim I, Sabbagh C, Lynn PB, Perez RO. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:822–828. - PubMed
    1. Locoregional failure during and after short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and surgery compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy and surgery: a 5-year follow-up of the RAPIDO trial. Dijkstra EA, Nilsson PJ, Hospers GA, et al. Ann Surg. 2023;278:0–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. Bujko K, Wyrwicz L, Rutkowski A, et al. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:834–842. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources