Ilizarov fixator as salvage procedure after frustrating arthrodesis using intramedullary nailing - is there a chance of consolidation?
- PMID: 39361060
- PMCID: PMC11582093
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05602-0
Ilizarov fixator as salvage procedure after frustrating arthrodesis using intramedullary nailing - is there a chance of consolidation?
Abstract
Introduction: Arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints is a salvage procedure that has been used successfully for years. Treatment options include internal procedures and external procedures. Retrograde intramedullary nailing is considered a safe procedure with a high degree of stability and comfort. Nevertheless, there are cases in which this internal arthrodesis fails and another procedure must be considered. Ilizarov fixator treatment could be a solution for those patients in whom intramedullary nailing has failed. Even if it means another surgical revision - is it possible to finally achieve consolidation with this method?
Materials and methods: In this single-center, retrospective study all documents of patients who underwent tibiotalar and subtalar joints fusion using the Ilizarov external fixator at our institution from 2003 to 2023 as secondary treatment after frustrated first arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail were reviewed. Nineteen patients (17 men and 2 women), with an average age of 55.7 (standard deviation (SD) 8.7, range 34-75) years were included.
Results: On average, 1.7 (SD 1.3, range 1-6) arthrodesis attempt were performed before final Ilizarov fixator arthrodesis. The average time spent in the Ilizarov fixator was 19 (SD 4, range 14-29) weeks. In seven cases (36.8%), both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints received bony consolidation in the end.
Conclusion: If patients have undergone fusion of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints with a retrograde nail and this fails, it is difficult to achieve complete consolidation in the further course. A further attempt at arthrodesis using an Ilizarov fixator is possible, but the overall results are also poor. This procedure must therefore be seen as a last resort before amputation.
Keywords: Ankle arthrodesis; Ilizarov fixator; Intramedullary nailing; Limb salvage; Retrospective study.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Ruhr-University Bochum (registration number 18-6582-BR). Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Figures


References
-
- Wünschel M (2011) Misserfolge Nach Arthrodesen am Fuss [Arthrodesis of the foot and ankle]. Orthopade 40(5):407–414. 10.1007/s00132-010-1723-0 - PubMed
-
- Jerosch J, Vollmert O (2005) Arthrodeseverfahren am oberen Sprunggelenk. Trauma Berufskrankh 7(Suppl 1):78–84. 10.1007/s10039-004-0945-y
-
- Morasiewicz P, Dejnek M, Orzechowski W, Szelerski Ł (2023) Subjective and objective outcomes of Ankle Joint Arthrodesis with either Ilizarov or internal fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 62(1):39–44. 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.03.009 - PubMed
-
- Rüschenschmidt M, Glombitza M, Dahmen J, Hax PM, Lefering R, Steinhausen E (2020) External versus internal fixation for arthrodesis of chronic ankle joint infections - a comparative retrospective study. Foot Ankle Surg 26(4):398–404. 10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.001 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources