Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 3;32(10):699.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08903-7.

Non-gastrointestinal symptom burden following colorectal cancer treatment-a systematic review

Affiliations

Non-gastrointestinal symptom burden following colorectal cancer treatment-a systematic review

Darren Fernandes et al. Support Care Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Improvements in screening and treatment have allowed for earlier detection and longer survival. However, treatments, which may involve surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, often lead to patients developing both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms that can persist long term. This systematic review aims to understand better the non-gastrointestinal symptoms that patients develop after colorectal cancer treatment and how these are identified and assessed through the use of questionnaires.

Method: The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched. Eligible studies evaluated the non-gastrointestinal symptoms that patients had developed and continued to have at 12 months or longer after treatment. Studies that were performed on patients who were within 12 months of treatment, who had a recurrent or a secondary cancer, had stage 4 cancer/were palliative or that looked solely at gastro-intestinal symptoms were excluded. Articles were limited to studies on human subjects written in English published between February 2012 and July 2024.

Results: The searches identified 3491 articles. Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria, of which, 33 were quantitative, 2 were qualitative and 2 were mixed methods study designs. Nearly two-thirds (n = 22) were cross-sectional studies, whereas 14 were longitudinal. One study had both a cross-sectional and longitudinal component to it. Most studies were of medium to high quality based on the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (n = 23) and were conducted in 14 countries, the majority of which were performed in the Netherlands (n = 14). The majority of participants in the included studies (n = 30/37) were men. There were also three studies that were performed with only female participants and one study that was performed with male participants only. The age range of research participants across all the studies was 29 to 89 years. Forty-five different validated questionnaires containing 5-125 question items were used to collect information on the side effects and impact of colorectal cancer treatment. Completion rate for questionnaires varied from 30 to 100% (median 63.5%). These determined effects on quality of life, emotional/psychological distress, sexual and urinary dysfunction, neuropathy, fatigue and hip pain.

Conclusion: This systematic review highlighted a wide range of longer-term non-gastrointestinal symptoms that frequently adversely affect QoL following treatment. These studies included highlighting the importance of nutrition/diet, physical activity, spirituality and communication in managing these long-term side effects.

Keywords: Cancer survivor; Colorectal cancer; Side effects; Survivorship; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sung H et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249 - PubMed
    1. Wang Y et al (2023) Global increase of colorectal cancer in young adults over the last 30 years: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 38(9):1552–1558 - PubMed
    1. Knudsen AB et al (2021) Colorectal cancer screening: an updated modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 325(19):1998–2011 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Trock B, Lanza E, Greenwald P (1990) Dietary fiber, vegetables, and colon cancer: critical review and meta-analyses of the epidemiologic evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 82(8):650–661 - PubMed
    1. Fedirko V et al (2011) Alcohol drinking and colorectal cancer risk: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis of published studies. Ann Oncol 22(9):1958–1972 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources