Intraoperative Management of Iatrogenic Durotomy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39363456
- PMCID: PMC11456941
- DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448346.173
Intraoperative Management of Iatrogenic Durotomy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
Abstract
This review aims to systematically evaluate the incidence, management strategies, and clinical outcomes of iatrogenic durotomy (ID) in endoscopic spine surgery and to propose a management flowchart based on the tear size and associated complications. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, focusing on studies involving endoscopic spinal procedures and incidental durotomy. The selected studies were analyzed for management techniques and outcomes, particularly in relation to the size of the dural tear and the presence of nerve root herniation. Based on these findings, a flowchart for intraoperative management was developed. A total of 14 studies were included, encompassing 68,546 patients. Varying incidences of ID, with management strategies largely dependent on the size of the dural tear, were found. Small tears (less than 5 mm) were often left untreated or managed with absorbable hemostatic agents, while medium (5-10 mm) and large tears (greater than 10 mm) required more complex approaches like endoscopic patch repair or open surgery. The presence of nerve root herniation necessitated immediate action, often influencing the decision to convert to open repair. Effective management of ID in endoscopic spine surgery requires a nuanced approach tailored to the size of the tear and specific intraoperative challenges, such as nerve root herniation. The proposed flowchart offers a structured approach to these complexities, potentially enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing complication rates. Future research with more rigorous methodologies is necessary to refine these management strategies further and broaden the applications of endoscopic spine surgery.
Keywords: Complication; Dura tear; Dural injury; Iatrogenic durotomy; Management; Surgical technique; Systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures



Comment in
-
Commentary on "Intraoperative Management of Iatrogenic Durotomy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review".Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):767-769. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448922.461. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Neurospine. 2024. PMID: 39363457 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Jitpakdee K, Liu Y, Heo DH, et al. Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now? Eur Spine J. 2023;32:2755–68. - PubMed
-
- Ahn Y, Lee S. Uniportal versus biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023;20:549–56. - PubMed
-
- Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:777–84. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources