A comparison between isoflurane and alfentanil supplemented anaesthesia for short procedures

Abstract

Sixty unpremedicated patients undergoing short urological and gynaecological procedures were randomly allocated to three groups to receive either methohexitone, alfentanil, nitrous oxide and oxygen, methohexitone, isoflurane and oxygen or methohexitone, isoflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen. The group receiving methohexitone, isoflurane and oxygen was abandoned after 11 patients had been studied, due to poor conditions during induction of anaesthesia. Therefore, data from only 51 patients are presented. Early recovery was assessed by time to opening eyes, giving correct name and date of birth; later, recovery was assessed by using the postbox test and deletion of 'p's. During anaesthesia and surgery, there was a high incidence of coughing and laryngospasm in the isoflurane groups. The patients in the alfentanil group opened their eyes and gave their names and dates of birth significantly faster postoperatively (p less than 0.01) than those in the isoflurane groups. However, there were no significant differences between the three groups regarding the later tests of recovery. The late recovery after isoflurane was equal to that obtained using an intravenous technique with alfentanil, although the peroperative complication rate was higher.