Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 19:15:1438029.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1438029. eCollection 2024.

Healthcare can't stop evolving: innovation as the catalyst for unleashing the managerial potential of value-based healthcare by stimulating intangible assets and enhancing organizational resilience

João Francisco Pollo Gaspary  1 , Vinícius Jaques Gerhardt  1 , Claudia de Freitas Michelin  2 , Luis Felipe Dias Lopes  3 , Carmen Brum Rosa  1 , Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk  1
Affiliations
Review

Healthcare can't stop evolving: innovation as the catalyst for unleashing the managerial potential of value-based healthcare by stimulating intangible assets and enhancing organizational resilience

João Francisco Pollo Gaspary et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: With increasing healthcare service utilization and the introduction of costly therapies, healthcare organizations are pressured to deliver cost-effective services within constrained budgets. Rising costs and the need for efficient healthcare delivery are major concerns for governments, insurers, and health plans.

Objectives: It aims to understand the impact of these intangible assets on creating value and organizational resilience in healthcare, informing better practices and strategies for VBHC implementation.

Methods: An applied research approach using the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) methodology was adopted. The research was divided into seven interconnected Work Packages (WPs), each designed to investigate different aspects of the integration between VBHC and intangible assets, with a focus on enhancing organizational resilience through innovative health processes. Key methodologies included literature reviews and qualitative analyses, employing Open Innovation and Design Thinking.

Results: The study revealed a dynamic interplay between VBHC, organizational resilience, and intangible assets. It showed that managerial effectiveness is influenced by direct patient outcomes and elements like intellectual capital and organizational reputation. Data integration from various Work Packages provided new insights into how intangible assets underpin VBHC strategies, proposing novel management approaches. Findings highlight the essential role of intangible assets in enhancing service delivery and fostering sustainable healthcare practices.

Discussion: The study highlights a significant oversight in the integration of intangible assets within healthcare organizations, despite their crucial role in optimizing VBHC. It supports literature emphasizing the importance of intellectual capital and organizational culture in enhancing healthcare management efficiency and resilience. A paradigm shift in VBHC to include these assets is needed for building a more adaptable and sustainable healthcare system. This integration can lead to better clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and overall healthcare efficiency, aligning more closely with VBHC goals.

Conclusion: Recognizing and effectively managing intangible assets are paramount for the successful implementation of VBHC and enhanced organizational resilience. Strategic integration of these assets into healthcare management practices can significantly improve patient outcomes and create a more sustainable, patient-centered, and resilient healthcare system. Future studies should develop methodologies for robust measurement and integration of these assets to fully realize the potential of VBHC.

Keywords: applied research; healthcare innovation and quality; healthcare management; organizational resilience: intangible assets in healthcare; patient outcomes measurement; value-based health care; work break structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
WPs connections.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram for systematic review (adapted from Page et al., 2021).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between each FPV and CSF.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Analysis of the value creation steps from intangible assets.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Framework of steps for data capture to collect intangible assets in healthcare companies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnott R., Harvey C. R., Kalesnik V., Linnainmaa J. T. (2021). Reports of value’s death may be greatly exaggerated. Financ. Anal. J. 77, 44–67. doi: 10.1080/0015198X.2020.1842704 - DOI
    1. Baglioni E., Campling L., Hanlon G. (2021). Beyond rentiership: standardisation, intangibles and value capture in global production. Environ. Plan A Econ. Space 55, 1528–1547. doi: 10.1177/0308518X21997835 - DOI
    1. Baldi G., Bodmer A. (2017). Intangible investments and international business cycles. I Econ Econ Policy. 14, 211–219. doi: 10.1007/s10368-016-0339-1 - DOI
    1. Bana e Costa C. A. B., Ensslin L., Cornêa É. C., Vansnick J. C. (1999). Decision support systems in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 113, 315–335. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00219-7 - DOI
    1. Bandurska H., Breś W., Zielezińska M., Mieloszyk E. (2023). Does potassium modify the response of zinnia (Zinnia elegans Jacq.) to long-term salinity? Plan. Theory 12:1439. doi: 10.3390/plants12071439, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources