'You Can Die With Me But I Won't Let You Live With Me', Exploring Social Influences on the Continuation of Heroin Use in Men Who Use Heroin
- PMID: 39364208
- PMCID: PMC11447827
- DOI: 10.1177/29768357241276320
'You Can Die With Me But I Won't Let You Live With Me', Exploring Social Influences on the Continuation of Heroin Use in Men Who Use Heroin
Abstract
Background: Heroin is a substance with a unique social profile in that it is commonly used by individuals alone but there is a paucity of qualitative research exploring how social influences impact the continuation of heroin use, particularly when people are trying to stop using heroin. This study explored social determinants which influence the continuation of heroin use in males in UK community treatment who use illicit heroin alongside opioid replacement therapy.
Design: Participants were self-selecting from an initial purposively recruited sample. Using Janis (1972) 8 symptoms of Groupthink as an a priori framework for analysis, the study method utilised qualitative interviews with fourteen males. The discussions were digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.
Findings: Contrasting with the evidence base, the sample included people who transitioned from recreational drug use to dependent heroin use without experiencing trauma of any kind. Far from becoming socially isolated when actively using heroin, interviews identified a shift in social networks from networks built on shared moments to networks underpinned by transactional exchange. Components of Groupthink were identified when participants described belonging to heroin using networks and continued to use heroin whilst trying to abstain though individual accountability was central to the decision to continue to use heroin.
Conclusions: The conflict between the individual goal of abstinence and the group goal of continuation suggests that social network interventions could be more successful if delivered to cohorts of people who buy heroin together.
Keywords: Opiates; groupthink; heroin; qualitative; relapse; substance use disorder.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
'This is hardcore': a qualitative study exploring service users' experiences of Heroin-Assisted Treatment (HAT) in Middlesbrough, England.Harm Reduct J. 2023 May 12;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00785-y. Harm Reduct J. 2023. PMID: 37173697 Free PMC article.
-
Risk perception, changing social context, and norms prevent transition to regular injection among people who smoke heroin.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Mar 1;208:107878. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107878. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020. PMID: 32014646
-
More than just 'free heroin': Caring whilst navigating constraint in the delivery of diamorphine assisted treatment.Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jun;116:104025. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104025. Epub 2023 Apr 14. Int J Drug Policy. 2023. PMID: 37062231
-
Recovery From Heroin Addiction: A Qualitative Study.Public Health Nurs. 2025 Mar-Apr;42(2):744-753. doi: 10.1111/phn.13526. Epub 2024 Dec 30. Public Health Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39740126 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[The information of the schizophrenic patient: actuality].Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):227-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82389-9. Encephale. 2005. PMID: 15959449 Review. French.
References
-
- Transform. A timeline of UK drug Policy. 2024. Accessed July 1, 2024. https://transformdrugs.org/timeline
-
- Mason T, Sutton M, Whittaker W, et al. The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: difference-in-differences analysis of the ‘payment by results for drugs recovery’ pilot. Addiction. 2015;110:1120-1128. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources