Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;30(10):2443-2459.
doi: 10.1177/13591053241284083. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

Identifying the ways in which tobacco cessation interventions have been tailored for sexual and gender minority individuals: A systematic review

Affiliations

Identifying the ways in which tobacco cessation interventions have been tailored for sexual and gender minority individuals: A systematic review

Justin J Fogarty et al. J Health Psychol. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals smoke at higher rates than their heterosexual and cisgender peers. SGM persons, especially transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals, face unique, adverse health effects associated with smoking. As such, SGM individuals may benefit from smoking cessation interventions that are tailored to meet their needs. This systematic review aims to describe the ways in which these interventions have been tailored for SGM individuals and summarize available acceptability and efficacy data. Four databases were searched to identify smoking cessation interventions adapted for SGM populations. Thirteen articles were identified, with tailored aspects focusing on culturally tailored references, SGM-specific psychoeducation, and intra-community support strategies. No clear patterns of efficacy were identified, and only one study included bioverified abstinence. Preliminary evidence suggests that smoking cessation interventions can be acceptably tailored to SGM individuals, however, additional research is needed to determine if SGM-tailored interventions are more efficacious than non-tailored approaches.

Keywords: intervention; nicotine; smoking; smoking cessation; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Aguirre CG, Bello MS, Andrabi N, et al. (2016) Gender, ethnicity, and their intersectionality in the prediction of smoking outcome expectancies in regular cigarette smokers. Behavior Modification 40(1–2): 281–302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amroussia N, Gustafsson PE and Pearson JL (2020) Do inequalities add up? Intersectional inequalities in smoking by sexual orientation and education among U.S. Adults. Preventive Medicine Reports 17: 101032. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amroussia N, Pearson JL and Gustafsson PE (2019) What drives us apart? Decomposing intersectional inequalities in cigarette smoking by education and sexual orientation among U.S. adults. International Journal for Equity in Health 18(1): 109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babb S, Malarcher A, Schauer G, et al. (2017) Quitting smoking among adults - United States, 2000–2015. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65(52): 1457–1464. - PubMed
    1. Belita E and Sidani S (2015) Attrition in smoking cessation intervention studies: A systematic review. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 47(4): 21–40. - PubMed

Publication types