Temporal trends and treatment patterns in anal fissure management: insights from a multicenter study in Italy
- PMID: 39365369
- PMCID: PMC11452494
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03011-4
Temporal trends and treatment patterns in anal fissure management: insights from a multicenter study in Italy
Abstract
Introduction: Anal fissure (AF) poses a common challenge in clinical practice, prompting various treatment approaches. This multicenter study, conducted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery, aimed to assess treatment trends in AF over a 10 year period.
Methods: A survey of proctologists and retrospective analysis of patient records were conducted to evaluate treatment modalities and outcomes across six different clinical scenarios based on AF presentation (acute/chronic) stratified by sphincter function (normal/hypertonic/hypotonic).
Results: Analysis of data from 17 principal investigators and 22,016 patients revealed significant variability in treatment approaches, influenced by factors such as symptom duration, anal tone, and surgeon preference. Conservative treatments were commonly utilized, while surgical interventions were reserved for refractory cases. Specifically, pharmaceutical treatment was administered to 66-75% of patients in cases of acute AF and 63-67% for chronic AF, while 10-15% underwent anal dilation, and < 2% received botulinum toxin injection. Among medical treatments, nifedipine with lidocaine and glycerin film-forming ointments were the most utilized. The most performed surgical techniques were fissurectomy and anoplasty, except for patients with chronic AF and hypertonic sphincter where sphincterotomy prevailed. Trends in treatment utilization varied depending on the clinical scenario, with notable shifts observed over time.
Conclusions: This study provides insights into the evolving landscape of AF management, highlighting the need for further research to elucidate optimal treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: Anal fissure; Botulinum toxin injection; Conservative treatment; Fissurectomy; Sphincterotomy; Surgery; Trends.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






References
-
- Lund JN, Scholefield JH (1996) Aetiology and treatment of anal fissure. Br J Surg 83(10):1335–1344 - PubMed
-
- Lindsey I et al (2004) Chronic anal fissure. Br J Surg 91(3):270–279 - PubMed
-
- Gil J et al (2010) Screening for the effectiveness of conservative treatment in chronic anal fissure patients using anorectal manometry. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(5):649–654 - PubMed
-
- Jin JZ et al (2022) A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for anal fissure. Surgery 172(1):41–52 - PubMed
-
- Abcarian H (1980) Surgical correction of chronic anal fissure: results of lateral internal sphincterotomy vs fissurectomy–midline sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 23(1):31–36 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources