Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision
- PMID: 39365583
- PMCID: PMC11452820
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34675
Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision
Abstract
Importance: Online pharmacies have emerged as stakeholders in abortion care since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relaxed in-person dispensing requirements in 2020. The role of online pharmacies in dispensing abortion medications following the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on June 24, 2022, is understudied.
Objective: To describe medication abortion prescription fulfillment patterns for 1 online pharmacy 1 year before and after the Dobbs v Jackson decision, considering patient, prescriber, and state policy characteristics.
Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study assesses deidentified medication abortion prescription fulfilment data from 1 online pharmacy. Prescribers sent prescription requests to the online pharmacy, which dispensed abortion medications to patients by mail. The study sample included prescription requests fulfilled by the online pharmacy between June 20, 2021, and June 24, 2023, for patients aged at least 18 years who received the combined medication abortion regimen. Data were analyzed from July 2023 to July 2024.
Exposures: The US Supreme Court Dobbs v Jackson decision on June 24, 2022.
Main outcomes and measures: Patient and prescriber characteristics are described, including patient age, state to which the prescription was sent, medications prescribed, and prescribing prescriber's clinic care modality (in-person only, hybrid [in-person and virtual], and virtual only). States were grouped according to the Guttmacher Institute classification of policy support for abortion (most or very supportive, somewhat supportive, and somewhat restrictive). Fulfillment trends were disaggregated by prescriber modality and state policy environment; 2 states with similar telehealth but differing coverage policies (Illinois and Colorado) were compared.
Results: The dataset included 87 942 observations. Most prescriptions were sent to individuals younger than 30 years (57.1%), with a mean (SD) age of 28.7 (6.4) years. Throughout the study period, the greatest volume of prescription requests came from states with most or very supportive policies and from prescribers at virtual-only platforms. More prescriptions were sent in the year after Dobbs v Jackson (daily mean [SD], 88.5 [47.2] prescriptions in March 2022 vs 201.5 [97.5] prescriptions in March 2023) with fulfillment spikes following the Dobbs v Jackson leak on May 2, 2022, and decision on June 24, 2022. State policy contexts mirrored the overall trends, while prescriber modality trends were unique, with a big spike in fulfillment at 12 weeks after the Dobbs v Jackson decision for hybrid clinics compared with in-person-only clinics and telehealth-only platforms, which saw their largest spikes in mean daily prescription fulfillment the week immediately after Dobbs v Jackson. Illinois and Colorado had similar fulfillment trends, with spikes immediately following the Dobbs v Jackson decision and overall higher fulfillment after Dobbs v Jackson, with a daily mean (SD) of 10.5 (7.0) prescriptions in Illinois and 8.8 (5.7) prescriptions in Colorado in March 2022 versus 26.6 (13.6) prescriptions in Illinois and 16.7 (10.1) prescriptions in Colorado in March 2023.
Conclusions and relevance: These findings illustrate the increasingly critical role online pharmacies play in direct-to-patient abortion care provision in the US and the strong linkages between virtual-only prescribers and online pharmacies. These findings suggest that barriers to accessing online pharmacies for abortion care should be removed.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Comment in
-
The Role of Online Pharmacies and Telehealth in Medication Abortion Access Post-Dobbs v Jackson Decision.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2435404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35404. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39365589 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418620. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38922616 Free PMC article.
-
Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.JAMA. 2024 May 14;331(18):1558-1564. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4266. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 38526865 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual Clinic Telehealth Abortion Services in the United States One Year After Dobbs: Landscape Review.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 5;26:e50749. doi: 10.2196/50749. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39102679 Free PMC article.
-
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38551970 Free PMC article.
-
The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US.Occup Health Sci. 2023;7(1):1-37. doi: 10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1. Epub 2023 Feb 20. Occup Health Sci. 2023. PMID: 36843836 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Behavioral Innovations to Access Abortion Post-Dobbs: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reddit's r/abortion Community in 2022.Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351192. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351192. Epub 2025 Jun 27. Inquiry. 2025. PMID: 40577373 Free PMC article.
References
-
- US Food and Drug Administration . Information about mifepristone for medical termination of pregnancy through ten weeks gestation. Accessed December 4, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-an...
-
- Women on Web . Who we are. Accessed July 9, 2024. https://www.womenonweb.org/en/page/521/who-we-are
-
- AidAccess . Who are we. Accessed July 9, 2024. https://aidaccess.org/en/page/561/who-are-we
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical