Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 4;15(1):8628.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53038-2.

Distinctive CD39+CD9+ lung interstitial macrophages suppress IL-23/Th17-mediated neutrophilic asthma by inhibiting NETosis

Affiliations

Distinctive CD39+CD9+ lung interstitial macrophages suppress IL-23/Th17-mediated neutrophilic asthma by inhibiting NETosis

Seunghan Han et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The IL-23-Th17 axis is responsible for neutrophilic inflammation in various inflammatory diseases. Here, we discover a potential pathway to inhibit neutrophilic asthma. In our neutrophil-dominant asthma (NDA) model, single-cell RNA-seq analysis identifies a subpopulation of CD39+CD9+ interstitial macrophages (IMs) suppressed by IL-23 in NDA conditions but increased by an IL-23 inhibitor αIL-23p19. Adoptively transferred CD39+CD9+ IMs suppress neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis), a representative phenotype of NDA, and also Th17 cell activation and neutrophilic inflammation. CD39+CD9+ IMs first attach to neutrophils in a CD9-dependent manner, and then remove ATP near neutrophils that contribute to NETosis in a CD39-dependent manner. Transcriptomic data from asthmatic patients finally show decreased CD39+CD9+ IMs in severe asthma than mild/moderate asthma. Our results suggest that CD39+CD9+ IMs function as a potent negative regulator of neutrophilic inflammation by suppressing NETosis in the IL-23-Th17 axis and can thus serve as a potential therapeutic target for IL-23-Th17-mediated neutrophilic asthma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. IL-23 inhibitor suppresses the development of Th17-mediated neutrophilic inflammation in NDA mice.
a Schematic diagram of allergen sensitization and challenge protocol. In the NDA mouse model, sensitization with PBS or OVA + LPS intranasally (i.n.) was followed by challenge with PBS or OVA (i.n.) at the indicated days. Isotype control, αIL-23p19, or dexamethasone (Dex), was treated at 1 hr before every challenge period. The inflammatory response was assessed at 48 hr after the last challenge. b Total cell, neutrophil, and eosinophil counts in BALF measured using flow (n = 8 mice per group). c RORγt+, T-bet+, and GATA3+ Th cell counts in CD4+ T cells (Live,Dump-FOXP3-CD44+CD4+TCRb+) measured using flow cytometry (n = 6 mice per group). d Levels of Th17 (IL-17), Th1 (IFN-γ), and Th2 (IL-13) cell-related cytokine in BALF (n = 8 mice per group). e Representative H&E staining of lung sections obtained from the indicated conditions. Scale bar = 100 μm. f Inflammatory scores quantified from H&E staining (PBS/PBS (n = 3), OVA + LPS/PBS (n = 3), OVA + LPS/OVA (n = 3), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (n = 5), and OVA + LPS/OVA+Dex (n = 5)). g Representative PAS staining of lung sections obtained from the indicated conditions. Scale bar = 200 μm. h PAS-positive area quantified from PAS staining (n = 4 mice per group) (i)Penh values measured using whole body plethysmography (PBS/PBS (n = 8), OVA + LPS/PBS (n = 9), OVA + LPS/OVA (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (n = 5), and OVA + LPS/OVA+Dex (n = 8)). j Rrs values measured using an invasive ventilated lung resistance method (PBS/PBS (n = 3), OVA + LPS/PBS (n = 4), OVA + LPS/OVA (n = 5), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (n = 4), and OVA + LPS/OVA + Dex (n = 5)). Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc correction (bd, f, h) and two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc correction (i, j).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Myeloid cell subpopulations expressing anti-inflammatory genes were increased by αIL-23p19 administration in NDA mouse lungs.
a Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot showing 11 clusters of CD45+ immune cells. b Dot plot showing relative expression of known marker genes of immune cells (x-axis) across all clusters (y-axis) (Supplementary Data 3). The color and diameter of the dots indicate the average expression of the indicated gene and the proportion of cells expressing the gene in each cluster, respectively. c Relative proportions of cells originated from three conditions in the five myeloid cell clusters. Proportions per cluster in each sample were normalized for their sum to be one. d UMAP plots showing subclusters of the indicated myeloid cell clusters. e Relative proportions of cells originated from three conditions in the subclusters of the indicated myeloid cell clusters. Red highlighted clusters with higher proportions of the cells in OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (P19) and OVA + LPS/PBS (PBS) than those in OVA + LPS/OVA (OVA). Proportions per cluster in each sample were normalized for their sum to be one. f Heat map showing gene ontology biological processes (GOBPs) enriched by marker genes for the five selected subclusters and their enrichment significance (p) from the DAVID software as –log10(p-value). Red labeled, GOBPs related to neutrophilic inflammation and subclusters in which those GOBPs are enriched. g Bar plot showing the mean percentage of cells expressing the indicated anti-inflammatory genes whose proteins are localized on the plasma membrane in TREM2high CM and Circulating NL. Red labeled, candidate genes associated with the inhibitory effects of αIL-23p19. (ag) n = 3 samples. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction (e).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Myeloid cell subpopulations identified by single-cell analyses were CD39+CD9+ IMs.
a Percentages of Ly6G+ neutrophils, b Ly6G-CD39+CD9+ IMs, and c Ly6G+CD39+CD9+ neutrophils in CD45+CD11b-CD11c- cells of lung under the indicated conditions. (ac, n = 10 per group). d Estimated fractions of CM subclusters in CD39+CD9+ IMs (n = 3 per group). In the box plots, the center line indicates the median value, the box limits indicate the upper and lower quartiles and the whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum. e Percentages of mononuclear (MN) and polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells in CD39+CD9+ IMs (blue bars) or Ly6G+ neutrophils (red bars) measured by Wright–Giemsa staining (right) (n = 10 per group). Representative staining images are shown (left). f Histograms of F4/80 and MHCII expression levels of CD39+CD9+ IMs (blue) or CD39-CD9- monocytes (gray). g Percentage of IL10+CD39+CD9+ IMs in the lung. h Level of IL-10 in BALF (g, h; OVA + LPS/PBS (n = 4), OVA + LPS/OVA (n = 5), and OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (n = 5)). i Representative images of immunostaining for PI (red), Annexin V-FITC (green), and T-PMT (light). Scale bar = 20 μm. j Percentage of CD39+CD9+ IMs (n = 36 per group), or CD39-CD9- monocytes (n = 15 per group) undergoing late apoptosis (Annexin V+/PI+) in field of view (FOV). k flow cytometry plot of Annexin V and PI. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Significance was determined by using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (ad, g, h, j).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. CD39 and CD9 are responsible for αIL-23p19-dependent suppression of Th17 cell activation and neutrophilic inflammation in NDA mice.
a Percentages of CD39+CD9+ IMs and (b) Ly6G+ neutrophils in CD45+CD11b-CD11c- cells of lung (n = 7 per group). c Total cell, (d) neutrophil counts in 7 groups: (i) OVA + LPS/PBS (n = 6), (ii) OVA + LPS/OVA (n = 6), (iii) OVA + LPS/OVA + POM1 (n = 6), (iv) OVA + LPS/OVA + αCD9 (n = 5), (v) OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (n = 6), (vi) OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + POM1 (n = 6), and (vii) OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + αCD9 (n = 6). e IL-17 and IL-22 levels in BALF (n = 5 per group). f Representative images of H&E staining and (g) inflammatory scores quantified from H&E staining (n = 4 per group). Scale bar = 100 μm. h Penh values were measured using whole-body plethysmography (n = 6 per group). Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction (ae, g) and two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc correction (h).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. CD39+CD9+ IMs are critical for αIL-23p19-dependent suppression of neutrophilic inflammation via inhibition of NETosis.
a Representative images of lung immunostaining for citrullinated histone H3 (citH3, red), MPO (green), and DAPI (blue). citH3+MPO+ NETs are shown in yellow. Scale bar = 20 μm. b Colocalization area (µm2) of citH3+MPO+ NETs in each FOV quantified using Zen software (n = 8 per group). c Ly6G+ neutrophil percentage in the lung (n = 6 per group). d total cell, (e) neutrophil counts in BALF and, (f) IL-17 and IL-22 levels in BALF (OVA + LPS/PBS (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + GSK484 (n = 6), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + POM1 (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + POM1 + GSK484 (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + αCD9 (n = 8), and OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + αCD9 + GSK484 (n = 8)). g Representative images of H&E staining and (h) inflammatory scores quantified from H&E staining. Scale bar = 100 μm (n = 3 per group). i Penh values measured using a whole body plethysmography (OVA + LPS/PBS (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + GSK484 (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + POM1 (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + POM1 + GSK484 (n = 8), OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + αCD9 (n = 6), and OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 + αCD9 + GSK484 (n = 4)). j IL-23 level in BALF (n = 6 per group) and (k) percentages of CD39+CD9+ IMs in CD45+CD11b+CD11c- cells in the lung (n = 6 per group). Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction (bf, h, j, k) and two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc correction (i).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. CD39+CD9+ IMs directly inhibit NETosis of neutrophils derived from NDA mice in CD39 and CD9-dependent manner.
a Representative confocal microscopy images of immunostaining for citH3 (red), MPO (green), and DAPI (blue) in co-cultured slides. Merged citH3+MPO+ NETs are shown in yellow. Ly6G+ neutrophils were co-cultured with CD39+CD9+ IMs or CD39-CD9- monocytes on chamber slides. b Colocalization area (µm2) of citH3+MPO+ NETs in each FOV quantified using Zen software (Neutrophils (n = 16), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs (n = 16), Neutrophils+CD39-CD9- monocytes (n = 9), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs + POM1 (n = 16), Neutrophils + CD39+CD9+ IMs + 100 μM ATP (n = 6), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs + 1 μM ATP (n = 16), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs + 0.1 μM ATP (n = 9), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs + 0.01 μM ATP (n = 9), and Neutrophils + CD39+CD9+ IMs + αCD9 (n = 16). c Representative photomultiplier tube (PMT) images showing immunostaining for MHCII (red) taken after 2 hr in the co-culture system. d Number of cell aggregates per FOV. Aggregates were defined as cells that adhered to at least five other cells (Netrophils (n = 22), Neutrophils + CD39+CD9+ IMs (n = 22), Neutrophils + CD39+CD9+ IMs + αCD9 (n = 22), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs + POM1 (n = 17), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs + 100 μM ATP (n = 17), and Neutrophils + CD39-CD9- monocytes (n = 17)). e Representative confocal microscopy images of immunostaining for citH3 (red), MPO (green), and MHCII (blue) in co-cultured slides. f Colocalization area (µm2) of citH3+MPO+ NETs in each FOV. Scale bar = 20 μm. (Netrophils (n = 22), Neutrophils + CD39+CD9+ IMs (n = 22), Neutrophils + CD39+CD9+ IMs + αCD9 (n = 22), Neutrophils + CD39+CD9+ IMs + POM1 (n = 7), Neutrophils+CD39+CD9+ IMs + 100 μM ATP (n = 18), and Neutrophils + CD39-CD9- monocytes (n = 18)). Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction (b, d, f).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. CD39+CD9+ IMs from PBS/PBS or OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 suppress Th17-mediated neutrophilic inflammation in NDA mice.
a Schematic diagram of the adoptive transfer protocol. CD39+CD9+ IMs were sorted from OVA + LPS/OVA + αIL-23p19 or PBS/PBS, while Ly6G+CD39+CD9+ neutrophils were sorted from PBS/PBS on day 24. These isolated cells were intravenously transferred on every challenge to the NDA mouse model. The inflammatory response was assessed at 48 hr after the last challenge. b Total cell and neutrophil counts in BALF. c Percentages of Ly6G+ neutrophils (b, c; n = 9 per group). d RORγt+ Th cells in CD4+ T cells in the lung. e Levels of IL-17 and IL-22 in BALF (d, e; Vehicle (PBS) → NDA mice (n = 10), CD39+CD9+ IM (OVA + LPS/OVA+αIL23p19)→NDA mice (n = 10), CD39+CD9+ IM (PBS/PBS) → NDA mice (n = 6), and Ly6G+CD39+CD9+ neutrophil IM (PBS/PBS) → NDA mice (n = 6)). f IL-23 in BALF (n = 3 per group). g Representative images of H&E staining and (h) inflammatory scores quantified from H&E staining (n = 6 per group). Scale bar = 100 μm. i Penh values were measured using a whole body plethysmography. (Vehicle (PBS) → NDA mice (n = 10), CD39+CD9+ IM (OVA + LPS/OVA+αIL23p19)→NDA mice (n = 10), CD39+CD9+ IM (PBS/PBS) → NDA mice (n = 6), and Ly6G+CD39+CD9+ neutrophil IM (PBS/PBS) → NDA mice (n = 6)). j Representative images of lung immunostaining for citH3 (red), MPO (green), and DAPI (blue). The citH3+MPO+ NETs are shown in yellow. k Colocalization area (µm2) of citH3+MPO+ NETs (n = 17 per group). Scale bar = 20 μm. l Violin plots showing distributions of the signature scores of TREM2high CM in patients with mild/moderate (n = 30) and severe asthma (n = 33) in the SARP cohort. Center line, median value. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction (bf, h, k), two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc correction (i), and one-tailed Student’s t test (l).

References

    1. Fanta, C. H. Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med.360, 1002–1014 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Holgate, S. T. Innate and adaptive immune responses in asthma. Nat. Med.18, 673–683 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Levy, B. D. et al. Future research directions in Asthma. An NHLBI working group report. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.192, 1366–1372 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuruvilla, M. E., Lee, F. E. & Lee, G. B. Understanding Asthma phenotypes, endotypes, and mechanisms of disease. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.56, 219–233 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Douwes, J., Gibson, P., Pekkanen, J. & Pearce, N. Non-eosinophilic asthma: importance and possible mechanisms. Thorax57, 643–648 (2002). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data