Effect of ecoliteracy on farmers' participation in pesticide packaging waste governance behavior in rural North China
- PMID: 39367047
- PMCID: PMC11452502
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73858-y
Effect of ecoliteracy on farmers' participation in pesticide packaging waste governance behavior in rural North China
Erratum in
-
Author Correction: Effect of ecoliteracy on farmers' participation in pesticide packaging waste governance behavior in rural North China.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 18;14(1):28505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79459-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39558041 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Farmers' participation in pesticide packaging waste (PPW) governance is important for improving agricultural pollution and achieving sustainable agricultural development. By incorporating the theory of planned behavior, value-belief-norm theory, cognition and behavior theory etc., we construct a theoretical model comprising "ecoliteracy-farmers' WTP in PPW governance-participation in PPW governance behavior." This study investigates how ecoliteracy affects farmers' participation in PPW governance and explores the mediating effect of farmers' willingness to participate (WTP) in PPW governance. We use structural equation modeling to analyze data collected from a questionnaire survey including 1118 samples of Chinese farmers. The results show that (1) Ecoliteracy significantly affects farmers' WTP in PPW governance. Ecological cognition, emotion, values, and knowledge and skills positively affect WTP in PPW governance, while ecological cognition and ecological knowledge and skills significantly affect participation in PPW governance behavior. (2) Farmers' WTP in PPW governance mediates ecoliteracy and governance participation behavior. (3) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that different planting scales, different planting categories, and receiving/not receiving government project support have different effects on farmers' participation in governance behavior. Farmers in the large-scale group are more likely to participate in governance than those in the medium- and small-scale groups, and farmers in the mixed grain and economic category are more likely to participate in governance than those in the economic and grain categories. Furthermore, farmers who receive government support are more likely to participate in governance than those who do not. Our results can serve as a policy making reference for promoting PPW governance in various regions.
Keywords: Ecoliteracy; Equation model (SEM) approach; Farmers’ participation in governance behavior; Mediating effects; Pesticide packaging waste; Sustainable development.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of government publicity and guidance on farmers' ecological environment governance participation behavior-The mediating effect of environmental literacy and perceived value.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0328274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328274. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40700420 Free PMC article.
-
Author Correction: Effect of ecoliteracy on farmers' participation in pesticide packaging waste governance behavior in rural North China.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 18;14(1):28505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79459-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39558041 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Assessing the impact of farmers' willingness to pay on different cultivated land attribute levels in China: an empirical analysis using the choice experiment method.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74280-0. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39384580 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Government Information on Farmers' Participation in Rural Residential Environment Governance: Mediating Effect Analysis Based on Moderation.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312607. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34886344 Free PMC article.
-
Farmers' Rights and Digital Sequence Information: Crisis or Opportunity to Reclaim Stewardship Over Agrobiodiversity?Front Plant Sci. 2021 Aug 13;12:686728. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.686728. eCollection 2021. Front Plant Sci. 2021. PMID: 34484258 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Delcour, I., Spanoghe, P. & Uyttendaele, M. Literature review: Impact of climate change on pesticide use. Food Res. Int.68, 7–15. 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.09.030 (2015).
-
- Fernandes, C. L., Volcao, L. M., Ramires, P. F., Moura, R. R. & Junior, F. M. Distribution of pesticides in agricultural and urban soils of Brazil: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts.22(2), 256–270. 10.1039/c9em00433 (2020). - PubMed
-
- Cai, J. Y., Xiong, J. J., Hong, Y. & Hu, R. F. Pesticide overuse in apple production and its socioeconomic determinants: Evidence from Shaanxi and Shandong provinces China. J. Clean. Prod.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128179 (2021).
-
- Jiao, S. J., Shan, Z. J., Cai, D. J. & Xu, H. Alert to the “rubbish on the farmland” - PPW pollution prevention and management recommendations. Environ. Protect.18, 42–44. 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2012.18.023(2012) (2012).
-
- Allan, S. F., Racke, K. D. & Hamilton, D. J. Disposal and degradation of pesticide waste. Rev. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol.177, 123–200. 10.1007/0-387-21725-8_3 (2003). - PubMed
Grants and funding
- 23BGL266/National Social Science Foundation of China
- 23BGL266/National Social Science Foundation of China
- 23BGL266/National Social Science Foundation of China
- JCZX2024008/Funded by Science Research Project of Hebei Education Department "Collaboration Mode and Benefit Distribution of Vegetable Supply Chain in Hebei Province to Beijing
- HBCT2023100301/Hebei Agriculture Research System
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources