Evaluating the effectiveness of Toxfin and Novasil as dietary aflatoxin-binding agents in broilers for sustaining hepatic antioxidant capacity and intestinal health status during aflatoxin B1 exposure
- PMID: 39367956
- DOI: 10.1007/s12550-024-00567-w
Evaluating the effectiveness of Toxfin and Novasil as dietary aflatoxin-binding agents in broilers for sustaining hepatic antioxidant capacity and intestinal health status during aflatoxin B1 exposure
Abstract
To assess the efficacy of Toxfin and Novasil as aflatoxin-binding agents in broilers exposed to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) from 11 to 30 days, 288 mixed-sex Ross 308 broiler chickens were randomly allocated to four dietary groups: control feed, control feed + 0.25 mg/kg AFB1, AFB1 feed + 0.3% Toxfin, and AFB1 feed + 0.3% Novasil. The evaluation encompassed growth performance for the grower (11-20 days), finisher (21-30 days), and overall (11-30 days) phases, carcass characteristics, serum biochemical components, liver function enzymes, hepatic antioxidant capacity, AFB1 residue in the liver and kidney, and ileal morphology at 30 days, and apparent nutrient digestibility during 29-30 days. Exposure to AFB1 significantly resulted in reduced growth efficiency, lowered carcass yields, liver hypertrophy, impaired metabolic and hepatic functions, liver oxidative stress, disrupted ileum architecture, diminished nutrient digestibility, and accumulated AFB1 in the liver and kidney. Conversely, supplementation of Toxfin or Novasil significantly augmented body weight gain (BWG) and reduced feed conversion ratio (FCR) during the finisher and overall phases, elevated BWG in the grower phase, heightened levels of glucose, hepatic protein, and glutathione peroxidase, declined malondialdehyde content, improved apparent metabolizable energy, and lowered AFB1 residues in the liver and kidney. Furthermore, Toxfin inclusion significantly reduced FCR during the grower phase, enhanced European production efficiency factor during the grower and overall phases, augmented dressing percentage, declined proportional liver weight, elevated concentrations of total protein, albumin, and total antioxidant capacity, heightened villus surface area, and boosted crude protein digestibility. To conclude, incorporating 0.3% Toxfin into broilers' feeds confers a more effectual safeguard than Novasil against the deleterious consequences of AFB1 exposure.
Keywords: Aflatoxin B1; Binding agents; Broiler; Intestinal integrity; Liver health; Performance.
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Mycotoxin (Research Gesellschaft für Mykotoxinforschung e.V.) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Chinese gallnut tannic acid on growth performance, blood parameters, antioxidative status, intestinal histomorphology, and cecal microbial shedding in broilers challenged with aflatoxin B1.J Anim Sci. 2022 Apr 1;100(4):skac099. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac099. J Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 35352127 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Hydrated Sodium Calcium Aluminosilicates and Discarded Date Pits as Dietary Adsorbents for Aflatoxin B1 in Enhancing Broiler Chicken Productive Performance, Hepatic Function, and Intestinal Health.Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 21;14(14):2124. doi: 10.3390/ani14142124. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39061586 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of dietary resveratrol in ameliorating aflatoxin B1-induced changes in broiler birds.J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2015 Dec;99(6):1094-104. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12260. Epub 2014 Oct 16. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2015. PMID: 25319220 Clinical Trial.
-
Aflatoxin B1: Challenges and Strategies for the Intestinal Microbiota and Intestinal Health of Monogastric Animals.Toxins (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;17(1):43. doi: 10.3390/toxins17010043. Toxins (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39852996 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of aflatoxin B1 on animal health: Metabolic processes, detection methods, and preventive measures.Toxicon. 2025 Feb;255:108262. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108262. Epub 2025 Jan 22. Toxicon. 2025. PMID: 39855607 Review.
Cited by
-
Are Aflatoxin Residues in Chicken Products a Real or Perceived Human Dietary Risk?Toxins (Basel). 2025 Apr 4;17(4):179. doi: 10.3390/toxins17040179. Toxins (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40278677 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abdelqader A, Al-Fataftah AR (2016) Effect of dietary butyric acid on performance, intestinal morphology, microflora composition and intestinal recovery of heat-stressed broilers. Livest Sci 183:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LIVSCI.2015.11.026 - DOI
-
- Abidin Z, Khatoon A, Numan M (2011) Mycotoxins in broilers: pathological alterations induced by aflatoxins and ochratoxins, diagnosis and determination, treatment and control of mycotoxicosis. Worlds Poult Sci J 67:485–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933911000535 - DOI
-
- Abrar M, Anjum FM, Butt MS, Pasha I, Randhawa MA, Saeed F, Waqas K (2013) Aflatoxins: biosynthesis, occurrence, toxicity, and remedies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53:862–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.563154 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abudabos AM, Al-Atiyat RM, Khan RU (2017) A survey of mycotoxin contamination and chemical composition of distiller’s dried grains with solubles (DDGS) imported from the USA into Saudi Arabia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:15401–15405. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-017-9130-2/TABLES/4 - DOI
-
- Adegbeye MJ, Reddy PR, Chilaka CA, Balogun OB, Elghandour MM, Rivas-Caceres RR, Salem AZ (2020) Mycotoxin toxicity and residue in animal products: prevalence, consumer exposure and reduction strategies – a review. Toxicon 177:96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOXICON.2020.01.007 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical