Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov:26 Suppl 1:e14384.
doi: 10.1111/tid.14384. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

Risk and benefits of expanded donor screening: A viewpoint from Germany

Affiliations
Review

Risk and benefits of expanded donor screening: A viewpoint from Germany

Carl-Ludwig Fischer-Fröhlich et al. Transpl Infect Dis. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

This review describes the risks and benefits of expanding screening for transmissible pathogens in deceased organ donors. The focus is on the experience and procedure in Germany to make a decision on how to proceed with a possible donor. Three issues are of interest in how screening policies impact the process with the aim of mitigating unexpected transmission risks: (1) Should we add universal or targeted nucleic acid testing to serological tests for common blood-borne viruses (BBVs; HIV, HBV, and HCV)? (2) Which tests should be added for screening in a geographically restricted region beyond testing for these BBVs? (3) Being faced with changes (e.g., climate and population) in the own geographically restricted region, what strategies are needed before implementing new tests, and which considerations apply for proper indication to do this? Testing may only be effective when during donor characterization the appropriate conclusions are drawn from the existing findings and screening tests are initiated. This statement overlaps the need to implement universal screening for a pathogen or targeted screening based on the risk that the donor has acquired the transmissible pathogen or is not as possible to identify by current methods of clinical judgment and/or specific tests.

Keywords: climate change; donor screening; expand testing; nucleic acid testing; population change.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Jones JM, Kracalik I, Levi ME, et al. Assessing solid organ donors and monitoring transplant recipients for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infection — U.S. Public Health Service guideline, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020;69(No. RR‐4):1‐16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6904a1
    1. EDQM Council of Europe. Guide to the Quality and Safety of Organs for Transplantation. 8th ed. EDQM Council of Europe; 2022.
    1. Fishman JA. Infection in organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17: 856‐879
    1. Theodoropoulos N, Ison MG. Donor‐derived infections: incidence, prevention, and management. Transpl Infect. 2016:113‐127. doi:10.1007/978‐3‐319‐28797‐3_8
    1. White SL, Rawlinson W, Boan P, et al. Infectious disease transmission in solid organ transplantation: donor evaluation, recipient risk, and outcomes of transmission. Transpl Dir. 2018; 5(1):e416. doi:10.1097/TXD.0000000000000852

LinkOut - more resources