Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatric liver transplantation: A comparison of strategies across the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) consortium
- PMID: 39368657
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.025
Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatric liver transplantation: A comparison of strategies across the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) consortium
Abstract
Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common complication after pediatric liver transplantation (PLT), the optimal method for CMV prevention is uncertain and lacks multicentered investigation. We compared the effectiveness of short (<120 days) vs long (>180 days) CMV primary antiviral prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in PLT, through a prospective cohort study of primary PLT (aged <18 years) recipients enrolled in the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation registry from 2015 to 2019 with either donor or recipient CMV seropositivity. Participants were grouped into short or long prophylaxis based on their center's practice and intended duration. In total, 199 PLT recipients were enrolled including 112 (56.3%) short and 87 (43.7%) long prophylaxis. End-organ disease was rare and similar between groups (2.7% and 1.1%; P = .45). CMV DNAemia and syndrome were more common in the short compared with those in long prophylaxis (26.8% vs 13.8%; P = .03; 18.8% vs 6.9%; P = .02). Neutropenia occurred more commonly with long prophylaxis (55.2% vs 16.1%; P < .001). Graft and patient survival were similar. Consideration of a short prophylaxis must weigh increased risk of CMV syndrome/DNAemia against medication burden and neutropenia of longer prophylaxis.
Keywords: cytomegalovirus; pediatric liver transplantation; prophylaxis.
Copyright © 2024 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interests The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by American Journal of Transplantation. L. Danziger-Isakov serves as a consultant for Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc and participates in contracted clinical research paid to her institution from Takeda and Merck. A. Jain serves as a consultant for Mirum and CAMP4 and has an advisory role with Gilead and Ipsen. Other authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by American Journal of Transplantation.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical