Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Nov;20(11):8002-8011.
doi: 10.1002/alz.14282. Epub 2024 Oct 6.

Brexpiprazole treatment for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia: A randomized study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Brexpiprazole treatment for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia: A randomized study

Yu Nakamura et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole for the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer's dementia (AAD) in Japanese patients.

Methods: This was a phase 2/3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients with AAD were randomized to receive brexpiprazole 1 mg/day or 2 mg/day, or placebo (3:4:4) for 10 weeks.

Results: For the primary endpoint (change in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory [CMAI] total score from baseline to Week 10), both brexpiprazole 1 mg and 2 mg groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement versus placebo (2 mg: least squares [LS] mean difference -7.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): -10.0 to -4.3], p-value < 0.0001, 1 mg: LS mean difference -3.7 [95% CI: -6.8 to -0.7], p-value = 0.0175). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events reported in the brexpiprazole 1 mg, 2 mg, and placebo groups were 76.8%, 84.6%, and 73.8%, respectively.

Discussion: Brexpiprazole 1 mg/day and 2 mg/day for 10 weeks was efficacious and well tolerated.

Highlights: Brexpiprazole treatment for 10 weeks improved agitation in Alzheimer's dementia. The efficacy of brexpiprazole 1 mg/day has been confirmed for the first time. The incidence of adverse events was higher compared to the previous studies. Both brexpiprazole 1 mg/day and 2 mg/day were generally well tolerated.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Japan; brexpiprazole; efficacy; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yu Nakamura has received speakers’ honoraria, manuscript fee, research support, or scholarship donation from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Viatris Pharmaceutical K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Teikoku Pharmaceutical K.K., Kowa Company Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, MSD K.K., Biogen Japan Ltd., and Daiichi Sankyo Company Ltd. Jun Adachi, Naoki Hirota, Katsuhiro Iba, Koichi Shimizu, Masami Nakai, Kaneyoshi Takahashi, and Naoki Mori are full‐time employees of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Author disclosures are available in the Supporting Information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient disposition. The safety analysis set consisted of patients who were randomized and administered at least one dose of study medication. The full analysis set consisted of patients who were randomized, administered at least one dose of study medication, and had a CMAI total score at baseline and at least one occasion after baseline. CMAI, Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Changes in CMAI and CGI‐S total scores from baseline to Week 10 (FAS). (A) MMRM analysis. The mean (SD) CMAI total scores at baseline were 62.1 (11.3) for brexpiprazole 1 mg, 64.1 (12.9) for brexpiprazole 2 mg, and 62.7 (11.7) for placebo. (B) MMRM analysis. The mean (SD) CGI‐S total scores at baseline were 4.5 (0.8) for brexpiprazole 1 mg, 4.6 (0.9) for brexpiprazole 2 mg, and 4.6 (1.0) for placebo. The scale of CGI‐S is 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. *p‐value < 0.05, **p‐value < 0.01, ***p‐value < 0.001. CGI‐S, Clinical Global Impression—Severity of Illness; CMAI, Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory; FAS, full analysis set; LS, least squares; MMRM, mixed models for repeated measures; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Change in CMAI subscale scores from baseline to Week 10 (FAS). MMRM analysis. Factor 1: aggressive behavior (both physical and verbal). Factor 2: physically nonaggressive behavior (excessive motor activity). Factor 3: verbally agitated behavior. *p‐value < 0.05, **p‐value < 0.01, ***p‐value < 0.001. CMAI, Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory; FAS, full analysis set; LS, least squares; MMRM, mixed models for repeated measures.

References

    1. Halpern R, Seare J, Tong J, Hartry A, Olaoye A, Aigbogun MS. Using electronic health records to estimate the prevalence of agitation in Alzheimer disease/dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;34:420‐431. doi:10.1002/gps.5030 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sano M, Cummings J, Auer S, et al. Agitation in cognitive disorders: progress in the International Psychogeriatric Association consensus clinical and research definition. Int Psychogeriatr. 2024;36:238‐250. doi:10.1017/S1041610222001041 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scarmeas N, Brandt J, Blacker D, et al. Disruptive behavior as a predictor in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:1755‐1761. doi:10.1001/archneur.64.12.1755 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. D'Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Panza F, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and functional status in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia patients. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:759‐771. doi:10.2174/156720512801322582 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters ME, Schwartz S, Han D, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as predictors of progression to severe Alzheimer's dementia and death: the Cache County Dementia Progression Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:460‐465. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14040480 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types