Association between telehealth use in oncology and downstream utilization at a large academic health system
- PMID: 39371018
- PMCID: PMC12009617
- DOI: 10.1177/1357633X241282820
Association between telehealth use in oncology and downstream utilization at a large academic health system
Abstract
Background: While telemedicine has been beneficial in oncology by reducing infectious exposure and improving access for patients with poor functional status, it also has intrinsic limitations, including the inability to perform a physical exam, which could lead to increased downstream utilization in this population at high risk of medical decompensation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating the relationship between telemedicine use in oncology and subsequent outpatient oncology encounters, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.
Methods: We included outpatient oncology encounters, including telemedicine and in-person visits, occurring between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 at a large academic health system. Unadjusted descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions were used to estimate subsequent outpatient oncology visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 30 days of an index visit based on modality (telemedicine versus in-person). The multiple regressions were adjusted for various demographic and clinical characteristics, including palliative care visits, baseline utilization, recent chemotherapy, and comorbidities.
Results: Our cohort included 63,722 patients with 689,356 outpatient encounters, of which 639,217 (92.7%) were in-person and 50,139 (7.3%) were telemedicine visits. Patients on average had 0.91 outpatient oncology visits, 0.04 ED visits, and 0.05 hospitalizations within 30 days following an index encounter. In our adjusted analyses, telemedicine was associated with 13.7 fewer downstream outpatient oncology visits (95% CI 12.5-14.9; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters, 0.7 fewer ED visits (95% CI 0.4-1.0; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters and 0.9 fewer hospitalizations (95% CI 0.6-1.3; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters compared to in-person visits.
Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, oncology patients who had a telemedicine visit had fewer follow-up outpatient oncology encounters, ED visits and hospitalizations after 30 days than those with in-person visits. Future studies should further investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in oncology and outline specific scenarios for appropriate use in this and other populations.
Keywords: Telemedicine; tele-oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Association Between In-Person vs Telehealth Follow-up and Rates of Repeated Hospital Visits Among Patients Seen in the Emergency Department.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2237783. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37783. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36282505 Free PMC article.
-
Use telehealth as needed: telehealth substitutes in-person primary care and associates with the changes in unplanned events and follow-up visits.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 3;23(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09445-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37138327 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Clinical Outcomes and Physician Adoption of Telemedicine for Chronic Disease Management: Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e66499. doi: 10.2196/66499. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40293797 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating a New Patient-Centered Approach for Cancer Care in Oncology Offices [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Jan. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Jan. PMID: 38373203 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Using Virtual Models of Care for Chronic Disease Management in Outpatient Services: A Systematic Review of Quality of Care Outcomes.Telemed J E Health. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2025.0008. Online ahead of print. Telemed J E Health. 2025. PMID: 40323664 Review.
References
-
- Parthiban N, Esterman A, Mahajan R, Twomey DJ, Pathak RK, Lau DH, et al. Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015. Jun 23;65(24):2591–600. - PubMed
-
- Sabesan S, Larkins S, Evans R, Varma S, Andrews A, Beuttner P, et al. Telemedicine for rural cancer care in North Queensland: Bringing cancer care home. [cited 2024 Aug 16]; Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01299.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Doolittle GC, Allen A. Practising oncology via telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare [Internet]. 1997. Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 16]; Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/1357633971930869 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Snoswell CL, Chelberg G, Guzman KRD, Haydon HM, Thomas EE, Caffery LJ, et al. The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare [Internet]. 2021. Jun 29 [cited 2024 Aug 16]; Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1357633X211022907 - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources