Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 2:16:225-233.
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S465546. eCollection 2024.

Follow Up Care After Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: Current Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Follow Up Care After Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: Current Perspectives

Francesco Lasorsa et al. Res Rep Urol. .

Abstract

Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare urologic tumor worldwide. In 2024, 2100 new cases and 500 deaths are estimated in the United States. Radical surgery via total penectomy has historically been the cornerstone of treatment, since it provides excellent long-term oncological control. The rationale of surgery for penile cancer was to achieve a 2 cm macroscopic surgical margin that is historically advocated to reduce recurrences. Over time, numerous studies have demonstrated that resection margin status does not affect patients' survival. Different penile-sparing techniques are currently recommended in the European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology (EAU-ASCO) guidelines for the treatment of localized primary PeCa. Centralization of care could yield multiple benefits, including improved disease awareness, higher rates of penile-sparing surgery, enhanced detection rates, increased utilization of less invasive lymph node staging techniques, enhanced quality of specialized histopathological examinations, and the establishment of specialized multidisciplinary teams. Compared to more aggressive treatments, the higher recurrence rates after penile-sparing surgery do not hamper neither the metastasis-free survival nor the overall survival. Repeated penile-sparing surgery could be considered for selected cases. The psychological impact of penile cancer is not negligible since the perceived loss of masculinity might adversely affect mental health and overall well-being. Quality of life may be compromised by sexual and urinary dysfunction which may be the result either of the loss of penile tissue or the psychological status of the patient. It is of utmost importance to offer rehabilitative treatment as sexual therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, family and peer counseling.

Keywords: penile cancer; penile-sparing surgery; quality of life; sexual function; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Penile sparing techniques. a: glans resurfacing; b: wide local excision; c: partial penectomy.

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. Ca a Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49. doi:10.3322/caac.21820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Menon S, Moch H, Berney DM, et al. WHO 2022 classification of penile and scrotal cancers: updates and evolution. Histopathology. 2023;82(4):508–520. doi:10.1111/his.14824 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amicuzi U, Grillo M, Stizzo M, et al. Exploring the multifactorial landscape of penile cancer: a comprehensive analysis of risk factors. Diagnostics. 2024;14(16):1790. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14161790 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marchioni M, Berardinelli F, De Nunzio C, et al. New insight in penile cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018;70(6). doi:10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03215-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gao W, Song L, Yang J, et al. Risk factors and negative consequences of patient’s delay for penile carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):124. doi:10.1186/s12957-016-0863-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources