Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul-Sep;30(3):260-267.
doi: 10.25259/IJPC_100_2024. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

Development of a Simple Patient-reported Outcome Measurement for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Receiving Home-based Palliative Care

Affiliations

Development of a Simple Patient-reported Outcome Measurement for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Receiving Home-based Palliative Care

Porntip Preechachaiyawit et al. Indian J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a patient-reported outcome measurement for terminally ill cancer patients (PROMs-TCP) receiving home-based palliative care, which is valid, reliable and easy to use by patients or caregivers to indicate urgent needs for assistance from the care team.

Materials and methods: Three-step approach consisting of literature review, focus groups and questionnaire testing. 169 terminally ill cancer patients who received palliative care at Cancer hospital, tertiary-care hospital and university school of medicine in Thailand. The PROMs-TCP comprised five key questions with a total score of 10 and one supplemental question. PROMs-TCP was tested for content validity, internal consistency and inter-rater reliability, criterion validity, discriminant validity and sensitivity to change. The palliative care outcome scale (POS) was used as an indicator.

Results: PROMs-TCP consists of five questions. The item-level content validity index (CVI) ranged from 0.8 to 1, and the scale-level CVI was 0.97. PROMs-TCP correlated well with POS scores, with correlations ranging from -0.7 to -0.8. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α = 0.85), while inter-rater agreements between patients and caregivers and between patients and nurses were moderate to good (Cohen's weighted k = 0.69-0.87). The tool could reasonably discriminate terrible days from good days for the patients. It was also responsive to change scores, with effect size scores of 0.36.

Conclusion: PROMs-TCP could be used for daily health status assessment of home-based patients with terminally ill cancer, supporting the provision of palliative care in primary care settings.

Keywords: Home-based palliative care; Outcome assessment; Primary care; Thailand.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Different cut-off points for the PROMs-TCP (n = 1,709). CI: Confidence interval, ROC: Receiver operating characteristic, AUC: Areas under the curve, PPV: Positive predictive value, NPV: Negative predictive value. PROMs-TCP: Patient-reported outcome measurement for terminally ill cancer patients. The bold values in the cut points show how sensitive and specificity of the data.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
The change score between PROMs-TCP and palliative care outcome scale assessment (n = 132). PROMs-TCP: Patient-reported outcome measurement for terminally ill cancer patients.

Similar articles

References

    1. WHO Palliative Care: Key Fact. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care [Last accessed on 2020 May 10]
    1. Bureau of Inspector General Ministry of Public Health Government Inspectorate Ministry of Health Ministry of Public Health Inspection Plan Fiscal Year 2017. Available from: https://203.157.185.18/download/inspection/1-2560/c%20%e0%b8%84%e0%b8%93... [Last accessed on 2018 May 10]
    1. Riolfi M, Mogliani E, Salvetti I, Poles G, Trivellato E, Manno P. Effectiveness and Challenges in Cancer Palliative Home-care Services: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Recenti Prog Med. 2021;112:647–52. - PubMed
    1. Riolfi M, Buja A, Zanardo C, Marangon CF, Manno P, Baldo V. Effectiveness of Palliative Home-care Services in Reducing Hospital Admissions and Determinants of Hospitalization for Terminally Ill Patients Followed Up by a Palliative Home-care Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Palliat Med. 2014;28:403–11. doi: 10.1177/0269216313517283. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collins ES, Witt J, Bausewein C, Daveson BA, Higginson IJ, Murtagh FE. A Systematic Review of the Use of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale and the Support Team Assessment Schedule in Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;50:842–53.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.015. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources