Definition, assessment and treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: expert opinion and practical recommendations
- PMID: 39371908
- PMCID: PMC11450451
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1451832
Definition, assessment and treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: expert opinion and practical recommendations
Abstract
A considerable proportion of patients with schizophrenia perform below population norms on standardized neuropsychological tests, and the performance of those performing within normal range is lower than predicted based on parental education. Cognitive impairment predates the onset of psychosis, is observed during symptom remission and in non-affected first-degree relatives of patients. At the present time, cognitive deficits are regarded as key features of schizophrenia, important determinants of poor psychosocial outcome and targets for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies. A group of eight key opinion leaders reviewed and discussed latest advances in scientific research and current good clinical practices on assessment, management, and treatment of CIAS. In the present paper they summarize the current evidence, identify main gaps between current knowledge and mental health services clinical practice, and provide practical recommendations to reduce the gap.
Keywords: CIAS; cognitive impairment; cognitive remediation; evidence-based; psychosocial functioning; psychosocial rehabilitation; schizophrenia; social cognition.
Copyright © 2024 Vita, Barlati, Cavallaro, Mucci, Riva, Rocca, Rossi and Galderisi.
Conflict of interest statement
SB received advisory board, lecture, or consulting fees, outside the present work, from: Angelini, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Otsuka. RC received advisory board fees from Boehringer and was a speaker for Rovi. SG reports consulting fees from Gedeon Richter; honoraria from Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Recordati, Rovi; and participation on data safety monitoring boards with Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Rovi. AM received advisory board or consultant fees from the following drug companies: Angelini, Rovi and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. MR has received compensation as speaker/consultant from Angelini, Lundbeck, Otzuka, Sumitomo Pharma, and Sunovion, and he has received research grants from Sumitomo Pharma. PR has received honoraria as consultant for lectures from Angelini, Janssen, Lundbeck, and Otsuka. Furthermore, she is in the advisory board of Angelini. AV received advisory board, lecture, or consulting fees, outside the present work, from: Angelini, Innova Pharma-Recordati, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Otsuka, and Pfizer. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
References
-
- Kraepelin E. Dementia praecox and paraphrenia (1919). Chicago: Chicago Medical Book Co. Available online at: http://archive.org/details/dementiapraecoxp00kraeiala (Accessed May 21, 2024).
-
- Bleuler E. Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias (1950). New York, USA: International Universities Press. Available online at: https://philarchive.org/rec/BLEDPO-2 (Accessed May 21, 2024).
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
