Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;35(4):2339-2350.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11076-w. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

Performance of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter and 2D shear wave elastography in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Affiliations

Performance of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter and 2D shear wave elastography in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Roberto Cannella et al. Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the performance and the reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

Methods: This study included consecutive adult patients with MASLD who underwent ultrasound with UGAP, 2D-SWE and percutaneous liver biopsy. The median values of 12 consecutive UGAP measurements were acquired by two independent radiologists (R1 and R2). Hepatic steatosis was graded by liver biopsy as: (0) < 5%; (1) 5-33%; (2) > 33-66%; (3) > 66%. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine the diagnostic performance. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: A hundred patients (median age 55.0 years old) with MASLD were prospectively enrolled. At histopathology, 70 and 42 patients had grade ≥ 2 and 3 steatosis, respectively. Median UGAP was 0.78 dB/cm/MHz (IQR/Med: 5.55%). For the diagnosis of grade ≥ 2 steatosis, the AUCs of UGAP were 0.828 (95% CI: 0.739, 0.896) for R1 and 0.779 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.856) for R2. The inter- and intra-operator reliability of UGAP were excellent, with an ICC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), respectively. The median liver stiffness was 6.76 kPa (IQR/Med: 16.30%). For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, 2D-SWE had an AUC of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.934), and the optimal cutoff value was > 6.75 kPa with a sensitivity of 80.6% and a specificity of 75.7%.

Conclusion: UGAP and 2D-SWE provide a good performance for the staging of steatosis and fibrosis in patients with MASLD with an excellent intra-operator reliability of UGAP.

Key points: Question How well do ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) perform for quantifying hepatic steatosis and fibrosis? Findings UGAP had a maximum AUC of 0.828 for the diagnosis of grade ≥ 2 steatosis, and 2D-SWE had an AUC of 0.862 for diagnosing advanced fibrosis. Clinical relevance UGAP and 2D-SWE allow rapid, reproducible, and accurate quantification of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis that can be used for the noninvasive assessment of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Keywords: Fatty liver; Fibrosis; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Obesity; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is T.V.B. Conflict of interest: The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: G.P. is a member of the Scientific Editorial Board (section: Oncology) for European Radiology. They did not participate in the selection or review processes for this article. R.C.: support for attending meetings from Bracco and Bayer; research collaboration with Siemens Healthineers. Statistics and biometry: One of the authors (R.C.) has significant statistical expertise. Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: None of the subjects or cohorts have been previously reported. Preliminary data reported in this manuscript were presented at SIRM 2022, ECR 2023, and ESGAR 2023 meetings. Methodology: Prospective Diagnostic or prognostic study Performed at one institution

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Plot box graphs with pairwise comparison of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) measurements provided by the two radiologists (A: R1; B: R2) in different steatosis grades
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) measurements (upper row) with the corresponding attenuation map (middle row) and histopathological correlation (lower row). A 68-year-old male with median UGAP of 0.71 dB/cm/MHz and 20% hepatic steatosis at histopathological analysis. B 41-year-old male with median UGAP of 0.76 dB/cm/MHz and 50% hepatic steatosis at histopathological analysis. C 21-year-old male with median UGAP of 0.93 dB/cm/MHz and 90% hepatic steatosis at histopathological analysis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic curves of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for the diagnosis of grade ≥ 2 (A) and grade 3 (B) steatosis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
2D shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) liver stiffness measurements (upper row) with the corresponding histopathological correlation (lower row). A 21-year-old male with median liver stiffness measurement of 5.81 kPa and periportal fibrosis (F1c) at histopathological analysis. B 58-year-old female liver stiffness measurement of 10.59 kPa and periportal and bridging fibrosis with nodular transformation (F4) at histopathological analysis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Receiver operating characteristic curves of 2D shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and transient elastography (TE) for the diagnosis of significant (A) and advanced (B) fibrosis

References

    1. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V et al (2023) A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol 79:1542–1556. 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.06.003 - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L (2023) The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology 77:1335–1347. 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P et al (2015) Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology 61:1547–1554. 10.1002/hep.27368 - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) (2016) EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 64:1388–1402. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004 - PubMed
    1. Rinella ME, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS et al (2023) AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 77:1797–1835. 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources