Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in solid organ transplant recipients: The international CALIPSO study
- PMID: 39374859
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106306
Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in solid organ transplant recipients: The international CALIPSO study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the risk of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
Methods: Retrospective multicenter study including SOT recipients with a first CDI episode in the year after transplantation (Jan 2017-June 2020). The primary outcome measure was recurrence, defined as a new CDI ≤56 days from the first episode. A competing risk analysis was performed using the sub-distribution hazard model multivariable analysis.
Results: 191 SOT recipients were included: 101 (52.9%) were kidney, 66 (34.6%) liver, 11 (5.8%) lung, 8 (4.2%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney, 4 (2.1%) heart and 1 (0.5%) pancreas alone recipients. Treatment for the first CDI were: vancomycin (n = 114,59.7%), vancomycin+metronidazole (n = 39,20.4%), metronidazole (n = 26,13.6%), fidaxomicin (n = 9,4.7%), 3 patients did not receive any therapy. After the first CDI, 17/191 (8.9%) patients died within 56-day mortality without having a recurrence, while 23/191 (12%) patients had a recurrence. Among patients with recurrent CDI, 56-day mortality rate was 30.4% (7/23 patients). On multivariable analysis, severe CDI (sHR4.01, 95% CI 1.77-9.08, p < .001) and metronidazole monotherapy (sHR 3.65, 95% CI 1.64-8.14, p = .001) were factors independently associated with recurrence.
Conclusions: Metronidazole monotherapy is associated with increased risk of recurrent CDI in SOT recipients. Therapeutic strategies aimed to reduce the risk of recurrence should be implemented in this setting.
Keywords: Bezlotoxumab; Clostridioides difficile; Metronidazole; Recurrence; Solid organ transplant.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: GT received honoraria for educational meetings by Shionogi and participated to scientific board for MSD. MF received unconditional grants from MSD, Gilead and speaker honoraria from Shionogi, Pfizer, Menarini, MSD, Gilead, GSK, MundiPharma and TermoFisher. Declared conflicts of interest are outside the submitted work and did not affect the scientific objectivity of this study. The other authors have none to declare.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical