Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct 7;11(1):e001471.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001471.

Adverse events after colonoscopy in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adverse events after colonoscopy in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial

Øyvind Bakken Rognstad et al. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Objective: Colonoscopy-related adverse events increase the burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This cross-sectional study evaluates adverse events during and after colonoscopy in a large, randomised CRC screening trial in Norway comparing sigmoidoscopy to immunochemical testing for faecal blood.

Methods: We included all individuals who underwent colonoscopy at two screening centres between 2012 and 2020. From medical records, we retrieved data on adverse events during and within 30 days after colonoscopy and classified them according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon for endoscopic adverse events. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify risk factors for adverse events.

Results: Of the 10 244 included individuals, 242 (2.4%) had at least one adverse event that was possibly, probably, or definitively related to the colonoscopy. 188 (1.8%) had mild adverse events, 50 (0.49%) had moderate, 3 (0.03%) had severe, and 1 had a fatal adverse event. The most frequent adverse events were lower gastrointestinal bleeding (0.86%), abdominal pain (0.48%), vasovagal reaction (0.39%), postpolypectomy syndrome (0.20%), and perforation (0.08%). 23 (0.22%) individuals had non-gastrointestinal adverse events. Risk factors associated with adverse events were older age, female sex, screening centre, anticoagulant therapy, number of polypectomies, size of lesion removed, presence of proximal lesion, and adenocarcinoma. Adverse event rates per endoscopist ranged from 0% to 4.9%.

Conclusion: Adverse events after colonoscopy of screening positives occurred in about 2 out of 100 procedures. Three-quarters of events were mild. Awareness of risk factors may help endoscopists to mitigate the risk.

Trial registration number: NCT01538550.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The bowel preparation used for colonoscopy was provided free of charge by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. SOF reports Chairman, The Norwegian Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism; Council Member, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism outside of the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study flow chart of patients included for analysis. *The sum may exceed the total number because of the possibility of individuals being identified both from health trust register, and periprocedural and postprocedural adverse event registration in the trial database. ASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; FIT, faecal immunochemical test.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Days from colonoscopy to adverse event. For all events (A) and moderate, severe, or fatal adverse events (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Unadjusted adverse event rates per endoscopist with more than 100 colonoscopies in the trial. Screening centre 1 blue, screening centre 2 orange. *One endoscopist from centre 2 had no adverse events.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin . 2021;71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sullivan BA, Noujaim M, Roper J. Cause, Epidemiology, and Histology of Polyps and Pathways to Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2022;32:177–94. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. 2021;325:1978. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Dam L, Bretthauer M. Ethical issues in colorectal cancer screening. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:315–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim GY, Walker JG, Bickerstaffe A, et al. The CRISP-Q study: Communicating the risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018;47:139–45. doi: 10.31128/AFP-04-17-4195. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data