Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 7;22(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00347-9.

Standardised reporting of burden of disease studies: the STROBOD statement

Brecht Devleesschauwer  1   2 , Periklis Charalampous  3 , Vanessa Gorasso  4 , Ricardo Assunção  5 , Henk Hilderink  6 , Jane Idavain  7 , Tina Lesnik  8 , Milena Santric-Milicevic  9   10 , Elena Pallari  11 , Sara M Pires  12 , Dietrich Plass  13 , Grant M A Wyper  14   15 , Elena Von der Lippe  16 , Juanita A Haagsma  3
Affiliations

Standardised reporting of burden of disease studies: the STROBOD statement

Brecht Devleesschauwer et al. Popul Health Metr. .

Abstract

Background: The burden of disease (BOD) approach, originating with the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study in the 1990s, has become a cornerstone for population health monitoring. Despite the widespread use of the Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) metric, variations in methodological approaches and reporting inconsistencies hinder comparability across studies. To tackle this issue, we set out to develop guidelines for reporting DALY calculation studies to improve the transparency and comparability of BOD estimates.

Methods and findings: The development of the STROBOD statement began within the European Burden of Disease Network, evolving from initial concepts discussed in workshops and training sessions focused on critical analysis of BOD studies. In 2021, a working group was formed to refine the preliminary version into the final Standardised Reporting of Burden of Disease studies (STROBOD) statement, consisting of 28 items structured across six main sections. These sections cover the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and open science, aiming to ensure transparency and standardization in reporting BOD studies. Notably, the methods section of the STROBOD checklist encompasses aspects such as study setting, data inputs and adjustments, DALY calculation methods, uncertainty analyses, and recommendations for reproducibility and transparency. A pilot phase was conducted to test the efficacy of the STROBOD statement, highlighting the importance of providing clear explanations and examples for each reporting item.

Conclusions: The inaugural STROBOD statement offers a crucial framework for standardizing reporting in BOD research, with plans for ongoing evaluation and potential revisions based on user feedback. While the current version focuses on general BOD methodology, future iterations may include specialized checklists for distinct applications such as injury or risk factor estimation, reflecting the dynamic nature of this field.

Keywords: Burden of disease; Checklist; Disability-adjusted life years; European burden of disease network; Reporting guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DP, JAH and GMAW are Associate Editors of Population Health Metrics. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2133–2161. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8. PMID:38642570 - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Donovan MR, Gapp C, Stein C. Burden of disease studies in the WHO European Region-a mapping exercise. Eur J Public Health. 2018;28(4):773–8. 10.1093/eurpub/cky060. (PMID: 29697771). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devleesschauwer B, Maertens C, de Noordhout G, Smit SA, Duchateau L, Dorny P, Stein C, Van Oyen H, Speybroeck N. Quantifying burden of disease to support public health policy in Belgium: opportunities and constraints. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1196. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hilderink HBM, Marjanne HD, Plasmans MJJC, Poos PED, Eysink RG. Dutch DALYs, current and future burden of disease in the Netherlands. Arch Public Health. 2020;78(1):85. 10.1186/s13690-020-00461-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porst M, von der Lippe E, Leddin J, Anton A, Wengler A, Breitkreuz J, et al. The burden of disease in germany at the national and regional level. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022;119(46):785–92. 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0314. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources