Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;56(1):2410408.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2410408. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Diagnostic accuracy of exhaled nitric oxide for the non-invasive identification of patients with fibrotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of exhaled nitric oxide for the non-invasive identification of patients with fibrotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

Huai Zhang et al. Ann Med. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Fibrotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a condition at risk of progressing to advanced liver disease. We examined whether an innovative exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) breath test (BT) can accurately diagnose fibrotic MASH without requiring blood tests.

Methods: One hundred and forty-seven patients with MASH were recruited, and all tests were undertaken within 1 week of recruitment. With fibrotic MASH (NAS ≥ 4 and fibrosis stage ≥ 2) as the main outcome indicator, the diagnostic efficacy of eNO in identifying fibrotic MASH was compared to other validated models for advanced fibrosis requiring venesection, namely FAST, Agile 3+, and FIB-4 scores.

Results: The mean age was 40.36 ± 12.28 years, 73.5% were men. Mean body mass index was 28.83 ± 4.31 kg/m2. The proportion of fibrotic MASH was 29.25%. The area under the receiver operating curve for eNO in diagnosing fibrotic MASH was 0.737 [95% CI 0.650-0.823], which was comparable to FAST (0.751 [0.656-0.846]), Agile 3+ (0.764 [0.670-0.858]), and FIB-4 (0.721 [0.620-0.821]) (all DeLong test p > 0.05). A cut-off of eNO <8.5 ppb gave a sensitivity of 86.0% and a negative predictive value of 88.5% for ruling-out fibrotic MASH. A cut-off of eNO >13.5 ppb provided a specificity of 91.3% and a positive predictive value of 65.4% for ruling-in fibrotic MASH. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the diagnostic efficacy of eNO was similar across characteristics such as age. Moreover, adding vibration-controlled transient elastography-LSM (liver stiffness measurement) reduced the uncertainty interval from 46.9% to 39.5%.

Conclusions: The eNO-BT is a promising simple test for non-invasively identifying fibrotic MASH, and its performance is further improved by adding LSM measurement.

Keywords: Exhaled nitric oxide; breath test; fibrotic MASH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diagnostic performance of eNO concentration. (A) AUROC of eNO concentration for the non-invasive identification of fibrotic MASH. (B) Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV versus all possible eNO concentrations. AUROC: area under receiver operation characteristics; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Stratification with a rule-out, “grey zone,” and rule-in zone when applying eNO to identify fibrotic MASH. (A) Using cut-off values of eNO. (B) Using cut-off values of eNO and LSM. LSM: liver stiffness measurement.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Subjects ruled out and ruled in or remaining in the “grey zone” after: (A) applying the currently recommended FAST cut-offs (0.35, 0.67) or (B) applying the eNO cut-offs (8.5 ppb, 13.5 ppb) obtained herein or (C) applying both the LSM cut-off (9.7 kPa) and eNO cut-offs (8.5 ppb, 13.5 ppb). One full human figure represents 2% of all subjects. Arrows indicate the number (and %) of reclassified patients. For example, when applying LSM as an aid, 10 fibrotic MASH patients (6.8% of the overall patient population) in the “grey zone” were ruled in with their correct diagnosis.

References

    1. Feng G, Valenti L, Wong VW-S, et al. . Recompensation in cirrhosis: unravelling the evolving natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21(1):46–56. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00846-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, et al. . A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73(1):202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. . Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11–20. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, et al. . Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):547–555. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. . Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(1):124–131. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.038. - DOI - PubMed