Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 26;36(1):286.
doi: 10.4102/sajid.v36i1.286. eCollection 2021.

Validation of Roche immunoassay for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 in South Africa

Affiliations

Validation of Roche immunoassay for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 in South Africa

Jurette S Grove et al. S Afr J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Serology testing is an important ancillary diagnostic to the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Roche Elecsys™ chemiluminescent immunoassay (Rotkreuz, Switzerland), that detects antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen, at an academic laboratory in South Africa.

Methods: Serum samples were collected from 312 donors with confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests, with approval from a large university's human research ethics committee. Negative controls included samples stored prior to December 2019 and from patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR and were confirmed negative using multiple serology methods (n = 124). Samples were stored at -80 °C and analysed on a Roche cobas™ 602 autoanalyser.

Results: Compared with RT-PCR, our evaluation revealed a specificity of 100% and overall sensitivity of 65.1%. The sensitivity in individuals > 14 days' post-diagnosis was 72.6%, with the highest sensitivity 31-50 days' post-diagnosis at 88.6%. Results were also compared with in-house serology tests that showed high agreement in majority of categories.

Conclusions: The sensitivity at all-time points post-diagnosis was lower than reported in other studies, but sensitivity in appropriate cohorts approached 90% with a high specificity. The lower sensitivity at earlier time points or in individuals without symptomatology may indicate failure to produce antibodies, which was further supported by the comparison against in-house serology tests.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; immunoglobulin G; immunoglobulin M; serology; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary of samples used in validation.

References

    1. Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Henry BM. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The portrait of a perfect storm. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(7):497–503. 10.21037/atm.2020.03.157 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Weekly operational update on COVID-19 [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 29] p. 1–10. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-cov...
    1. Alvi MM, Sivasankaran S, Singh M. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological efforts at prevention, mitigation, and treatment for COVID-19. J Drug Target. 2020;28(7–8):742–754. 10.1080/1061186X.2020.1793990 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mayne ES, Scott HL, Semete B, et al. . The role of serological testing in the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. S Afr Med J. 2020;110(9):842–845. 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i9.15098 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guo L, Ren L, Yang S, et al. . Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(15):778–785. 10.1093/cid/ciaa310 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources