Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 23:15:1399388.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399388. eCollection 2024.

A new neuropsychological tool for simultaneous reading and executive functions assessment: initial psychometric properties

Affiliations

A new neuropsychological tool for simultaneous reading and executive functions assessment: initial psychometric properties

Vinícius Figueiredo de Oliveira et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The development of reading and complex executive functions is fundamental for achieving social, academic, and professional success. So far, there is no single neuropsychological instrument that comprehensively assesses the domains of inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and reading comprehension. To assess executive functions related to reading, the "Assessment of Reading and Executive Functions" (AREF) was developed. In this study, we show initial evidence of validity and reliability for four subtests - Graphophonological-Semantic Flexibility, Inhibitory Control, Flexibility, and Working Memory.

Methods: A total of 93 students from 4th to 9th grade, aged 8-14, in public (n = 61) and private (n = 32) schools were evaluated. Tasks from the AREF instrument, as well as measures of reading comprehension, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and intelligence, were administered. Correlations between AREF scores and the other measures were performed to assess external construct validity. Performance differences between school groups on AREF subtests were analyzed using ANOVA, t-test, and Mann-Whitney tests, and the internal consistency of the instrument's tasks was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

Results: The scores of the AREF subtests demonstrated significant positive correlations with reading measures (ranging from 0.339 to 0.367) and executive functions (ranging from 0.209 to 0.396). Significant differences were found in the performance of some AREF tasks when comparing individuals from public and private schools, as well as between 4th and 5th graders compared to students in higher grades. The internal consistency of the tasks was low for Graphophonological-Semantic Flexibility (Cronbach's α = 0.566), moderate for Inhibitory Control and Flexibility (Cronbach's α = 0.768), and high for Working Memory (Cronbach's α = 0.881).

Discussion: The results provide initial evidence of construct validity and reliability for the AREF subtests. It is expected that this new neuropsychological test will contribute to the assessment of reading skills and executive functions, assisting in guiding clinical and educational interventions for individuals with and without neurodevelopmental disorders.

Keywords: cognitive flexibility; executive functions; inhibitory control; neuropsychological assessment; psychometric validation; reading; reading comprehension; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The AREF (ALEFE) is in negotiations for potential commercialization by the publisher AMPLA, which could, in the future, remunerate the researchers.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of classifying 4 words in the Graphophonological-Semantic Flexibility subtest matrix, simultaneously considering the meaning of the words and the initial letters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of text without interference from other colors used as a baseline for the AREF Inhibitory Control and Flexibility subtests.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of text from the first Inhibitory Control task of the AREF test, in which the participant must read only the black lines.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of text from the second Inhibitory Control task of the AREF test, in which the participant must read only the black lines while avoiding reading words written in black on colored lines.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of text from the AREF Flexibility task, in which the participant must alternate reading between sentences of different colors depending on the color of the visual sign (line) present in the text.

References

    1. American Educational Research Association (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
    1. Babayiğit S. (2015). The relations between word reading, oral language, and reading comprehension in children who speak English as a first (L1) and second language (L2): a multigroup structural analysis. Read. Writ. 28, 527–544. doi: 10.1007/s11145-014-9536-x - DOI
    1. Best J. R., Miller P. H., Naglieri J. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learn. Individ. Differ. 21, 327–336. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borella E., De Ribaupierre A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learn. Individ. Differ. 34, 86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.001 - DOI
    1. Burgess A. N., Cutting L. E. (2023). The Behavioral and neurobiological relationships between executive function and Reading: a review of current and preliminary findings. Mind Brain Educ. 17, 267–278. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12378 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources