Decision trees for determining the fate of laboratory animals

Abstract

Facilities involved in laboratory animal research often face ethical challenges such as: what should I do with the animals that are no longer suitable for experimental purposes? One of the common answers to this question is to kill them. And while numerous scientifically justifiable reasons exist for killing laboratory animals, we must not overlook our ethical responsibility towards these sentient beings. Animal facility managers and scientists frequently find themselves in a moral dilemma, torn between furthering their research and addressing the well-being of experimental animals required for their studies. We elaborated a concept consisting of six decision trees and recommendations for making informed decisions about the need to kill laboratory animals in research facilities, considering legal and ethical considerations. The concept is based on the German regulatory perspective. However, the measures and decisions for animal welfare can be implemented in all laboratory animal facilities. These recommendations suggest several courses of action, including implementing consistent breeding plans, exploring alternative uses, reassigning surplus animals and their organs, and establishing appropriate housing capacity limits that ensure species-appropriate care. We encourage scientists and animal facility managers to develop and implement decision-making frameworks and procedures tailored to their specific facilities, in the hope that this work will promote a thoughtful and responsible approach to the complex challenges associated with the killing of laboratory animals, advancing scientific progress and the humane treatment of these animals.

Keywords: Fate laboratory animal; decision trees; killing laboratory animal; laboratory animal ethics; reasonable cause killing.