Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 8:13:e56353.
doi: 10.2196/56353.

Investigating Data Diversity and Model Robustness of AI Applications in Palliative Care and Hospice: Protocol for Scoping Review

Affiliations

Investigating Data Diversity and Model Robustness of AI Applications in Palliative Care and Hospice: Protocol for Scoping Review

Selen Bozkurt et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a pivotal element in health care, leading to significant advancements across various medical domains, including palliative care and hospice services. These services focus on improving the quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses, and AI's ability to process complex datasets can enhance decision-making and personalize care in these sensitive settings. However, incorporating AI into palliative and hospice care requires careful examination to ensure it reflects the multifaceted nature of these settings.

Objective: This scoping review aims to systematically map the landscape of AI in palliative care and hospice settings, focusing on the data diversity and model robustness. The goal is to understand AI's role, its clinical integration, and the transparency of its development, ultimately providing a foundation for developing AI applications that adhere to established ethical guidelines and principles.

Methods: Our scoping review involves six stages: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consulting with stakeholders. Searches were conducted across databases including MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase.com, IEEE Xplore, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science Core Collection, covering studies from the inception of each database up to November 1, 2023. We used a comprehensive set of search terms to capture relevant studies, and non-English records were excluded if their abstracts were not in English. Data extraction will follow a systematic approach, and stakeholder consultations will refine the findings.

Results: The electronic database searches conducted in November 2023 resulted in 4614 studies. After removing duplicates, 330 studies were selected for full-text review to determine their eligibility based on predefined criteria. The extracted data will be organized into a table to aid in crafting a narrative summary. The review is expected to be completed by May 2025.

Conclusions: This scoping review will advance the understanding of AI in palliative care and hospice, focusing on data diversity and model robustness. It will identify gaps and guide future research, contributing to the development of ethically responsible and effective AI applications in these settings.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/56353.

Keywords: AI; artificial intelligence; clinical settings; data diversity; decision support; dissemination; end-of-life care; ethical frameworks; hospice; hospice environments; methodology; model robustness; palliative care; thematic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reddy V, Nafees A, Raman S. Recent advances in artificial intelligence applications for supportive and palliative care in cancer patients. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2023;17(2):125–134. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000645.01263393-202306000-00009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Storick V, O'Herlihy A, Abdelhafeez S, Ahmed R, May P. Improving palliative and end-of-life care with machine learning and routine data: a rapid review. HRB Open Res. 2019;2:13. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12923.2. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32002512 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xie W, Butcher R. Artificial intelligence decision support tools for end-of-life care planning conversations: CADTH horizon scan [Internet] Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. 2023 - PubMed
    1. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1(2):389–399. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2. - DOI
    1. de Panfilis L, Peruselli C, Tanzi S, Botrugno C. AI-based clinical decision-making systems in palliative medicine: ethical challenges. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023;13(2):183–189. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002948.bmjspcare-2021-002948 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources