Selling Misleading "Cancer Cure" Books on Amazon: Systematic Search on Amazon.com and Thematic Analysis
- PMID: 39378429
- PMCID: PMC11496910
- DOI: 10.2196/56354
Selling Misleading "Cancer Cure" Books on Amazon: Systematic Search on Amazon.com and Thematic Analysis
Abstract
Background: While the evidence base on web-based cancer misinformation continues to develop, relatively little is known about the extent of such information on the world's largest e-commerce website, Amazon. Multiple media reports indicate that Amazon may host on its platform questionable cancer-related products for sale, such as books on purported cancer cures. This context suggests an urgent need to evaluate Amazon.com for cancer misinformation.
Objective: This study sought to (1) examine to what extent are misleading cancer cure books for sale on Amazon.com and (2) determine how cancer cure books on Amazon.com provide misleading cancer information.
Methods: We searched "cancer cure" on Amazon.com and retrieved the top 1000 English-language book search results. We reviewed the books' descriptions and titles to determine whether the books provided misleading cancer cure or treatment information. We considered a book to be misleading if it suggested scientifically unsupported cancer treatment approaches to cure or meaningfully treat cancer. Among books coded as misleading, we conducted an inductive latent thematic analysis to determine the informational value the books sought to offer.
Results: Nearly half (494/1000, 49.4%) of the sampled "cancer cure" books for sale on Amazon.com appeared to contain misleading cancer treatment and cure information. Overall, 17 (51.5%) out of 33 Amazon.com results pages had 50% or more of the books coded as misleading. The first search result page had the highest percentage of misleading books (23/33, 69.7%). Misleading books (n=494) contained eight themes: (1) claims of efficacious cancer cure strategies (n=451, 91.3%), (2) oversimplifying cancer and cancer treatment (n=194, 39.3%), (3) falsely justifying ineffective treatments as science based (n=189, 38.3%), (4) discrediting conventional cancer treatments (n=169, 34.2%), (5) finding the true cause of cancer (n=133, 26.9%), (6) homogenizing cancer (n=132, 26.7%), (7) discovery of new cancer treatments (n=119, 24.1%), and (8) cancer cure suppression (n=82, 16.6%).
Conclusions: The results demonstrate that misleading cancer cure books are for sale, visible, and prevalent on Amazon.com, with prominence in initial search hits. These misleading books for sale on Amazon can be conceived of as forming part of a wider, cross-platform, web-based information environment in which misleading cancer cures are often given prominence. Our results suggest that greater enforcement is needed from Amazon and that cancer-focused organizations should engage in preemptive misinformation debunking.
Keywords: Amazon; cancer; cancer cure; cancer information; cancer misinformation; cancer treatment; e-commerce; misinformation; misleading; online information; thematic analysis; treatment.
©Marco Zenone, May van Schalkwyk, Greg Hartwell, Timothy Caulfield, Nason Maani. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.10.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Algorithms and Health Misinformation: A Case Study of Vaccine Books on Amazon.J Health Commun. 2020 May 3;25(5):394-401. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1776423. Epub 2020 Jun 14. J Health Commun. 2020. PMID: 32536257
-
Testosterone Imposters: An Analysis of Popular Online Testosterone Boosting Supplements.J Sex Med. 2019 Feb;16(2):203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.008. J Sex Med. 2019. PMID: 30770069 Free PMC article.
-
The Online Cancer Nutrition Misinformation: A framework of behavior change based on exposure to cancer nutrition misinformation.Cancer. 2022 Jul 1;128(13):2540-2548. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34218. Epub 2022 Apr 5. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35383913
-
An Analysis of Popular Online Erectile Dysfunction Supplements.J Sex Med. 2019 Jun;16(6):843-852. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.269. Epub 2019 Apr 26. J Sex Med. 2019. PMID: 31036522 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33470931 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Holdren J, Surkan K, Downing A. Perspectives of people with cancer or hereditary cancer risk on the use and value of online peer support. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Apr 18;10(2):58–67. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1968. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/37091112 jpcrr-10.2.58 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lazard AJ, Nicolla S, Vereen RN, Pendleton S, Charlot M, Tan H, DiFranzo D, Pulido M, Dasgupta N. Exposure and reactions to cancer treatment misinformation and advice: survey study. JMIR Cancer. 2023 Jul 28;9:e43749. doi: 10.2196/43749. https://cancer.jmir.org/2023//e43749/ v9i1e43749 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB. Complementary medicine, refusal of conventional cancer therapy, and survival among patients with curable cancers. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 01;4(10):1375–1381. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2487. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30027204 2687972 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical