Towards integrated cross-sectoral surveillance of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance: Needs, approaches, and considerations for linking surveillance to action
- PMID: 39378692
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109046
Towards integrated cross-sectoral surveillance of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance: Needs, approaches, and considerations for linking surveillance to action
Abstract
Pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) microorganisms are continually transmitted between human, animal, and environmental reservoirs, contributing to the high burden of infectious disease and driving the growing global AMR crisis. The sheer diversity of pathogens, AMR mechanisms, and transmission pathways connecting these reservoirs create the need for comprehensive cross-sectoral surveillance to effectively monitor risks. Current approaches are often siloed by discipline and sector, focusing independently on parts of the whole. Here we advocate that integrated surveillance approaches, developed through transdisciplinary cross-sector collaboration, are key to addressing the dual crises of infectious diseases and AMR. We first review the areas of need, challenges, and benefits of cross-sectoral surveillance, then summarise and evaluate the major detection methods already available to achieve this (culture, quantitative PCR, and metagenomic sequencing). Finally, we outline how cross-sectoral surveillance initiatives can be fostered at multiple scales of action, and present key considerations for implementation and the development of effective systems to manage and integrate this information for the benefit of multiple sectors. While methods and technologies are increasingly available and affordable for comprehensive pathogen and AMR surveillance across different reservoirs, it is imperative that systems are strengthened to effectively manage and integrate this information.
Keywords: Antimicrobial Resistance; Infectious disease; One Health; Surveillance.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rachael Lappan reports financial support was provided by Australian Research Council. Francesca Short reports financial support was provided by Australian Research Council. Dena Lyras reports financial support was provided by Australian Research Council. Trevor Lithgow reports financial support was provided by National Health and Medical Research Council. Chris Greening reports financial support was provided by National Health and Medical Research Council. Multiple authors (RISE Program) reports financial support was provided by Wellcome Trust. Multiple authors (RISE Program) reports financial support was provided by New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Multiple authors (RISE Program) reports financial support was provided by Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Multiple authors (RISE Program) reports financial support was provided by Government of Fiji. Multiple authors (RISE Program) reports financial support was provided by Asian Development Bank. Steven Chown reports financial support was provided by Australian Research Council. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical