Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov;23(6):e70025.
doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.70025.

Prioritization of chemical food safety hazards in the European feed supply chain

H J van der Fels-Klerx  1 , E D van Asselt  1 , S P J van Leeuwen  1 , F O Dorgelo  1 , E F Hoek-van den Hil  1
Affiliations
Review

Prioritization of chemical food safety hazards in the European feed supply chain

H J van der Fels-Klerx et al. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Extensive monitoring programs of chemical hazards in the animal feed chain are in place, both organized by public and private organizations. The objective of this review was to prioritize chemical hazards for monitoring in the European animal feed supply chain. A step-wise approach was designed for the prioritization, based on: historical occurrence of the chemicals in animal feed ingredients and animal feeds (in relation to European guidance values or maximum limits in feed); information on transfer of the chemical to edible animal products, and; the extent of human dietary intake of the products and possible adverse human health effects of the chemical. Possible prioritization outcomes were: high (H), medium (M), or low (L) priority for monitoring, or classification not possible (NC) because of limited available data on the transfer of the chemical to edible animal tissues. The selection of chemicals included (with results in parentheses): dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls (H); brominated flame retardants (H); per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (H); the heavy metals arsenic (H) and cadmium (H) as well as lead (M) and mercury (M); aflatoxins (H), ochratoxin A (NC), and other mycotoxins (L); pyrrolizidine alkaloids (H) and other plant toxins (NC); organochlorine pesticides (H) and other pesticides (L); pharmaceutically active substances (M); hormones (NC); polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (L), heat-induced processing contaminants (NC), and mineral oils (NC). Results of this study can be used to support risk-based monitoring by food safety authorities and feed-producing companies in Europe.

Keywords: animal feed; chemical compounds; contaminants; prioritization; risk ranking.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abrahams, P. W., & Steigmajer, J. (2003). Soil ingestion by sheep grazing the metal enriched floodplain soils of mid‐Wales. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 25(1), 17–24.
    1. Adamse, P., Van der Fels‐Klerx, H. J., & de Jong, J. (2017). Cadmium, lead, mercury and arsenic in animal feed and feed materials—Trend analysis of monitoring results. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 34(8), 1298‐1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1300686
    1. Ali, H., & Khan, E. (2018). What are heavy metals? Long‐standing controversy over the scientific use of the term ‘heavy metals’–Proposal of a comprehensive definition. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 100(1), 6–19.
    1. Allen, H. K. (2014). Antibiotic resistance gene discovery in food‐producing animals. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 19, 25–29.
    1. Amlund, H., Berntssen, M., Lunestad, B., & Lundebye, A.‐K. (2012). Aquaculture feed contamination by persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, additives and drug residues. In Animal feed contamination (pp. 205–229), J Fink‐Gremmels (Ed.). Woodhead Publishing.

LinkOut - more resources