Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 8;15(1):8710.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52958-3.

Time-variant parity-time symmetry in frequency-scanning systems

Affiliations

Time-variant parity-time symmetry in frequency-scanning systems

Mingjian Li et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Parity-time (PT) symmetry is an active research area that provides a variety of new opportunities for different systems with novel functionalities. For instance, PT symmetry has been used in lasers and optoelectronic oscillators to achieve single-frequency lasing or oscillation. A single-frequency system is essentially a static PT-symmetric system, whose frequency is time-invariant. Here we investigate time-variant PT symmetry in frequency-scanning systems. Time-variant PT symmetry equations and eigenfrequencies for frequency-scanning systems are developed. We show that time-variant PT symmetry can dynamically narrow the instantaneous linewidth of frequency-scanning systems. The instantaneous linewidth of a produced frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) waveform is narrowed by a factor of 14 in the experiment. De-chirping and radar imaging results also show that the time-variant PT-symmetric system outperforms a conventional frequency-scanning one. Our study paves the way for a new class of time-variant PT-symmetric systems and shows great promise for applications including FMCW radar and lidar systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Time-variant PT-symmetric frequency-scanning system.
a Illustration of a time-invariant PT-symmetric single-frequency system (upper) and the produced single-frequency signal (lower). b Illustration of a time-variant PT-symmetric frequency-scanning system (upper) and the produced frequency-scanning signal (lower). c Instantaneous gain-time diagram (left) and net gain at a certain time window (right) for a conventional frequency-scanning system. a.u.: arbitrary units. d Instantaneous gain-time diagram (left) and net gain at a certain time window (right) for the PT-symmetric frequency-scanning system. e Example of the time-variant PT-symmetric frequency-scanning system in practical applications. It can be used as a key signal source to provide the required FMCW waveform for radar and lidar systems.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Produced FMCW waveform with narrow instantaneous linewidth.
a Block diagram of a PT-symmetric frequency-scanning FDML OEO that used in the experiment. SLS: Swept light source; PM: phase modulator; EDFA: Erbium-doped fiber amplifier; OC: optical coupler; TOA: tunable optical attenuator; TDL: tunable delay line; PD: photodetector; EC: electrical coupler; EA: electrical amplifier. b Temporal waveform of the generated FMCW waveform. c Instantaneous frequency-time diagram calculated by the short-time Fourier transform of the temporal waveform. d Instantaneous frequency-time diagram obtained based on self-homodyne and the Hilbert transformation. Inset: Zoom-in view showing the instantaneous linewidth of the time-variant PT-symmetric frequency-scanning oscillator. e Instantaneous frequency-time diagram of a FMCW waveform generated by a conventional frequency-scanning oscillator. Inset: Zoom-in view showing the instantaneous linewidth. f Frequency error between an FMCW waveform generated by the time-variant PT-symmetric frequency-scanning oscillator and an ideal linear FMCW waveform. g Frequency error between an FMCW waveform generated by a conventional frequency-scanning oscillator and an ideal linear FMCW waveform.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. De-chirped signal using the FMCW waveform generated by the time-variant PT-symmetric and conventional FDML OEO.
a Schematic diagram of the de-chirp processing link. Illustrations of the instantaneous frequency-time diagram and de-chirped signal of b the time-variant PT-symmetric FDML OEO and c a conventional FDML OEO. Spectra of the de-chirped signal of d the time-variant PT-symmetric FDML OEO and e a conventional FDML OEO. Insert: Zoom-in view showing the 3-dB bandwidth of the de-chirped signal. Details of the de-chirped signal corresponding to f the time-variant PT-symmetric FDML OEO and g a conventional FDML OEO. RBW: resolution bandwidth.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Radar range profiles and point target imaging results.
The results of radar range profiles based on a the time-variant PT-symmetric and b conventional frequency-scanning oscillators, and the point-target imaging results based on c the time-variant PT-symmetric and d conventional frequency-scanning oscillators.

References

    1. Bender, C. M. & Boettcher, S. Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998).
    1. Heiss, W. D. Exceptional points of non-Hermitian operators. J. Phys. A Math. Theor.37, 2455 (2004).
    1. Rüter, C. E. et al. Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics. Nat. Phys.6, 192–195 (2010).
    1. Feng, L., El-Ganainy, R. & Ge, L. Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity–time symmetry. Nat. Photonics11, 752–762 (2017).
    1. El-Ganainy, R. et al. Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry. Nat. Phys.14, 11–19 (2018).

LinkOut - more resources