Patients' attitudes toward artificial intelligence in dentistry and their trust in dentists
- PMID: 39379636
- DOI: 10.1007/s11282-024-00775-1
Patients' attitudes toward artificial intelligence in dentistry and their trust in dentists
Abstract
Objectives: This study intended to evaluate patients' attitudes toward the use of AI in dental radiographic detection of occlusal caries and the impact of AI-based diagnosis on their trust in dentists.
Methods: A total of 272 completed questionnaires were included in this study. In the first part of the study, approval was obtained from the patients, and data were collected about their socio-demographic characteristics. In the second part the 11-item Dentist Trust Scale was applied. In the third and fourth parts, there were questions about two clinical scenarios, the patients' knowledge of attitudes toward AI, and how the AI-based diagnosis had affected their trust. Evaluation was performed using a Likert-type scale. Data were analyzed with the Chi-square, one-way ANOVA, and ordinal logistic regression tests (p < 0.05).
Results: The patients believed that "AI is useful" (3.86 ± 1.03) and were not afraid of the use of AI in dentistry (2.40 ± 1.05). Educational level was considerably related to the patients' attitudes to the use of AI for dental diagnostics (p < 0.05). The patients stated that "dentists are extremely thorough and careful" (4.39 ± 0.77).
Conclusions: The patients displayed a positive attitude to AI-based diagnosis in the dental field and appear to exhibit trust in dentists. The use of Al in routine clinical practice can provide important benefit to physicians as a clinical decision support system in dentistry and understanding patients' attitudes may allow dentists to shape AI-supported dentistry in the future.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Communication; Dentist trust; Diagnosis; Machine learning; Patients.
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval (2023.01.03–1333) for this cross-sectional study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Yıldırım Beyazit University. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.
References
-
- Thomas MF, Ricketts DN, Wilson RF. Occlusal caries diagnosis in molar teeth from bitewing and panoramic radiographs. Prim Dent Care. 2001;8:63–9. https://doi.org/10.1308/135576101322647908 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Talpur S, Azim F, Rashid M, Syed SA, Talpur BA, Khan SJ. Uses of different machine learning algorithms for diagnosis of dental caries. J Healthc Eng. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5032435 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Gomez J. Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(Suppl):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S3 . - DOI
-
- Wenzel A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis of caries in a historical perspective: from film to machine-intelligence supported systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1259/DMFR.20210010 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Mohammad-Rahimi H, Motamedian SR, Rohban MH, Krois J, Uribe SE, Mahmoudinia E, et al. Deep learning for caries detection: a systematic review. J Dent. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104115 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical