Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 7;8(10):e70007.
doi: 10.1002/hem3.70007. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Safe and potent anti-CD19 CAR T-cells with shRNA-IL-6 gene silencing element in patients with refractory or relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations

Safe and potent anti-CD19 CAR T-cells with shRNA-IL-6 gene silencing element in patients with refractory or relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Jin-Feng Ma et al. Hemasphere. .

Abstract

Severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) have limited the widespread use of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T)-cell therapy. We designed a novel anti-CD19 CAR (ssCART-19) with a small hairpin RNA (shRNA) element to silence the interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene, hypothesizing it could reduce sCRS and ICANS by alleviating monocyte activation and proinflammatory cytokine release. In a post hoc analysis of two clinical trials, we compared ssCART-19 with common CAR T-cells (cCART-19) in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL). Among 87 patients, 47 received ssCART-19 and 40 received cCART-19. Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in 14.89% (7/47) of the ssCART-19 group versus 37.5% (15/40) in the cCART-19 group (p = 0.036). ICANS occurred in 4.26% (2/47) of the ssCART-19 group (all grade 1) compared to 15% (2/40) of the cCART-19 group. Patients in the ssCART-19 group showed comparable rates of treatment response (calculated with rates of complete remission and incomplete hematological recovery) were 91.49% (43/47) for ssCART-19 and 85% (34/40) for cCART-19 (p = 0.999). With a median follow-up of 21.9 months, cumulative nonrelapse mortality was 10.4% for ssCART-19 and 13.6% for cCART-19 (p = 0.33). Median overall survival was 37.17 months for ssCART-19 and 32.93 months for cCART-19 (p = 0.40). Median progression-free survival was 24.17 months for ssCART-19 and 9.33 months for cCART-19 (p = 0.23). These data support the safety and efficacy of ssCART-19 for r/r B-ALL, suggesting its potential as a promising therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CAR T manufacturing data. (A) Transduction efficiency of ssCART‐19 group and cCART‐19 group (p = 0.313; t‐test). (B) CD4+/CD8+ T‐cell ratio of ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 group (p = 0.440; t‐test). (C) Cytotoxicity of ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups against target cells (p = 0.364; t‐test).
Figure 2
Figure 2
AEs, CRS, and ICANS in patients with 28 days after CAR T‐cell infusion. (A) Number of AEs at any grade for ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.204; t test). (B) Number of grade ≥3 AEs in the ssCART‐19 group and cCART‐19 group (p = 0.026; t test). (C) Number of CRS at any grade for ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p < 0.001; Mann–Whitney nonparametric test). (D) Percentage of different grades of CRS for ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.036; Fisher's exact test). (E) Grade of ICANS for ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.009; Mann–Whitney nonparametric test). Percentage of different grades of ICANS for ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.049; Fisher's exact test). (F) Percentage of different grades of ICANS for ssCART‐19 groups and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.0449; Fisher's exact test).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cytokine levels in the two groups. (A–G) Scatter plots of the peak concentration of interleukin 6 (IL‐6), IL‐2, tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), IL‐4, IL‐10, IL‐17A, and IFN‐γ. (H–L) Dynamic changes in the cytokines IL‐6, TNF‐α, IL‐2, IL‐10, and IFN‐γ within 28 days after CAR T‐cell infusion.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Response rates in the two groups (p = 0.999; t test).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Swimmer plot of 87 patients showing treatment responses after CAR T‐cell infusion.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Response and survival. (A) NRM of the two groups of patients. (B, C) Kaplan–Meier curves of progression‐free survival and overall survival.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Expansion of CAR T‐cells. (A) C max in the ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.960). (B) T max in the ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.768). (C) Dynamic expansion of CAR T‐cells within 30 days postinfusion. The results showed no difference in the copies of CAR T‐cells in the ssCART‐19 and cCART‐19 groups (p = 0.438).

References

    1. June CH, O'Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2018;359(6382):1361‐1365. - PubMed
    1. Park JH, Rivière I, Gonen M, et al. Long‐term follow‐up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):449‐459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. June CH, Sadelain M. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(1):64‐73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chong EA, Ruella M, Schuster SJ. Five‐year outcomes for refractory B‐cell lymphomas with CAR T‐cell therapy. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(7):673‐674. - PubMed
    1. Westin JR, Kersten MJ, Salles G, et al. Efficacy and safety of CD19‐directed CAR‐T cell therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B‐cell lymphomas: observations from the JULIET, ZUMA‐1, and TRANSCEND trials. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(10):1295‐1312. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources