Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2024 Sep 24:12:1488924.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488924. eCollection 2024.

Editorial: Global perspectives on the health inequities in sexual, reproductive, and maternal health post Roe v. Wade

Deborah L Billings  1 , Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha  2 , Andrea Swartzendruber  3 , Lucy A Ingram  3
Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial: Global perspectives on the health inequities in sexual, reproductive, and maternal health post Roe v. Wade

Deborah L Billings et al. Front Public Health. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization; Roe v. Wade; health inequities; maternal health; reproductive health; sexual health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Comment on

  • Editorial on the Research Topic Global perspectives on the health inequities in sexual, reproductive, and maternal health post Roe v. Wade

References

    1. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's health organization, 597 U.S. Washington, DC: United States Reports; (2022).
    1. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller AB, Tunçalp Ö, Beavin C, et al. . Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. Lancet Glob Health. (2020) 8:e1152–61. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Lancet . Why Roe v. Wade must be defended. Lancet. (2022) 399:1845. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00870-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevenson AJ. The pregnancy-related mortality impact of a total abortion ban in the United States: a research note on increased deaths due to remaining pregnant. Demography. (2021) 58:2019–28. 10.1215/00703370-9585908 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kheyfets A, Miller B, Amutah-Onukagha N. Implications for racial inequities in maternal health if Roe v. Wade is lost. Lancet. (2022) 400:9–11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01024-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources