Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 7:10:20552076241287894.
doi: 10.1177/20552076241287894. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Digital health literacy: A concept analysis

Affiliations
Review

Digital health literacy: A concept analysis

Suyeon Ban et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Objective: To elucidate the concept of digital health literacy by delineating its primary dimensions, origins and effects. Through this clarification, we seek to augment our understanding of the contemporary use of the concept of digital health literacy.

Methods: Rodgers's concept analysis was employed to investigate digital health literacy as a context-influenced concept evolving with technological progress. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, RISS, KISS and DBpia) and Google Scholar were searched from 2006 to 2023, focusing on the terms 'digital health literacy', 'eHealth literacy' and 'mHealth literacy'. Of 2,819 papers, 32 were included in the analysis to identify the conceptual structure of digital health literacy.

Results: The conceptual structure of digital health literacy was identified, and its evolution was traced. Currently, the four critical attributes are (a) goal-driven regulation, (b) information processing, (c) communication and (d) utilisation. Functional literacy, prior health knowledge and experience, and access to technology are antecedents, while positive health outcomes, increased perceived control and enhanced health-related quality of life emerged as consequences. Additionally, the concept was influenced by multilevel contextual factors.

Conclusions: By enhancing our understanding of digital health literacy; standardising its terminology; and exploring the interactions among its antecedents, consequences and influencing factors, this study aims to reduce health disparities and promote equitable health in the digital era. The results of this foundational work, which establishes a basis for future research and policy development, provide clear pathways for developing targeted interventions and measurement tools of digital health literacy, ultimately contributing to better health practices.

Keywords: Digital health literacy; concept analysis; digital health; eHealth; eHealth literacy; health inequities; healthcare disparities; social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The flowchart of the article inclusion process (PRISMA flow diagram was derived).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Conceptual structure of digital health literacy.

References

    1. Pravettoni G, Triberti S. P5 eHealth: An agenda for the health technologies of the future. 1st ed. New York: Springer Cham, 2020.
    1. Choi E. The autonomy of the elderly in constructing medical knowledge through digital media. Kor J Med Ethics 2019; 22: 174–185.
    1. World Health Organization. Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019. - PubMed
    1. Campanozzi LL, Gibelli F, Bailo P, et al. The role of digital literacy in achieving health equity in the third millennium society: a literature review. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1109323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global Digital Health Partnership. Clinical engagement in digital health. The Hague: Global Digital Health Partnership, 2022.

LinkOut - more resources