The ASPECT hydrocephalus system: investigating clinical applicability and system utility
- PMID: 39382611
- PMCID: PMC11464604
- DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06274-w
The ASPECT hydrocephalus system: investigating clinical applicability and system utility
Abstract
Purpose: Hydrocephalus presents diagnostic and management challenges due to its heterogeneity. The ASPECT Hydrocephalus System, introduced in 2023, offers a comprehensive approach to describing patients with hydrocephalus. This study investigates the clinical applicability of the ASPECT Hydrocephalus System compared to the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) and demonstrates its utility.
Methods: Two hundred pediatric and adult patients with hydrocephalus treated at Copenhagen University Hospital between September 2019 and 2020 were described according to the ASPECT Hydrocephalus System. The latest brain imaging served as assessment point.
Results: Forty-seven percent of patients had more than one ICD-10 code assigned, and 40.5% of patients had an unspecific ICD-10 code as the most recent. It was possible to apply factor A (anatomy), S (symptomatology), P (previous interventions), C (complications) and T (time of onset) to all patients. Factor E (etiology) categorized 15% of patients as 'unknown'. Combining factor A and S showed a similar incidence of acute high-pressure symptoms in patients with and without ventriculomegaly on imaging (39.7% vs 39.3%), demonstrating how symptoms and neuro-radiological findings do not necessarily correlate.
Conclusion: The ASPECT Hydrocephalus System's applicability and utility were demonstrated in a large, diverse patient population. Except for 'Etiology', all factors could be applied to the entire population showing the system's robustness. While limitations in ICD-10 may force clinicians to choose between clinical measures, the ASPECT Hydrocephalus System allows comprehensive patient characterization, potentially aiding in clinical decision-making and research. Its use depends on registration quality. Application in prospective cohorts is warranted to assure feasibility.
Keywords: ASPECT Hydrocephalus System; Hydrocephalus.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Andresen M, Juhler M (2012) Multiloculated hydrocephalus: a review of current problems in classification and treatment. Child’s Nerv Syst 28(3):357–362 - PubMed
-
- Beni-Adani L, Biani N, Ben-Sirah L, Constantini S (2006) The occurrence of obstructive vs absorptive hydrocephalus in newborns and infants: Relevance to treatment choices. Child’s Nerv Syst 22(12):1543–1563 - PubMed
-
- Bräutigam K, Vakis A, Tsitsipanis C (2019) Pathogenesis of idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A review of knowledge. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 61:10–13 - PubMed
-
- Dandy WE (1914) An experimental, clinical and pathological study. Am J Dis Child VII(6):406
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
